1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02428420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The history of method and theory in the study of prehistoric puebloan pottery style in the American Southwest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Culture historians purposefully constructed and evaluated artifact classes, often ceramic types, to construct chronologies. These types measured cultural transmission (subsequently modified types often did not [Graves 1998]), although culture historians understood this in implicit or commonsense terms. Similarly, the mapped historical relationships, the quintessential time-space charts, were explained by implicit or ad hoc processes drawn from ethnography and sociocultural anthropology, processes that explained homologous similarity in those disciplines: migration, diffusion, trade, and the like.…”
Section: Ethan E Cochranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture historians purposefully constructed and evaluated artifact classes, often ceramic types, to construct chronologies. These types measured cultural transmission (subsequently modified types often did not [Graves 1998]), although culture historians understood this in implicit or commonsense terms. Similarly, the mapped historical relationships, the quintessential time-space charts, were explained by implicit or ad hoc processes drawn from ethnography and sociocultural anthropology, processes that explained homologous similarity in those disciplines: migration, diffusion, trade, and the like.…”
Section: Ethan E Cochranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless, Hill never realized (or at least did not point out) that his own work on pottery from east-central Arizona was built specifically around "normative behavior." Martin (1970, p. 196), an intellectual and financial supporter of the ceramic studies of Hill, Longacre, and others (Graves, 1998;Longacre, 2000), endorsed Hill's (1970a) opinion of normative theory, adding that it is "stultifying" and that it and concepts like it "muddy the waters and retard methodological and theoretical advances. .…”
Section: Early Mischaracterizationsmentioning
confidence: 93%