2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The history of child protection in the African American community: Implications for current child welfare policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These variables were selected based on the standing literature and on the absence of large portions of missing data. The variable for child’s race is African American/Black was used because this race is overrepresented in the child welfare population (Jimenez, 2006; Knott & Giwa, 2012). Additional child race or ethnicity variables were not included in the analyses because of concerns about missing data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables were selected based on the standing literature and on the absence of large portions of missing data. The variable for child’s race is African American/Black was used because this race is overrepresented in the child welfare population (Jimenez, 2006; Knott & Giwa, 2012). Additional child race or ethnicity variables were not included in the analyses because of concerns about missing data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most prominent philosophies regarding a response to maltreatment is termed parens patriae. Within the United States, the current relationship between children and government is said to be defined by this philosophy ( Jimenez, 2006;Small & Wanke, 1994). As noted by Hamilton (2006), ''Parens patriae power is the state's power to act to protect from harm or promote the welfare of individuals who lack the capacity to act in their own best interest' ' (p. 34).…”
Section: Philosophy Of Response To Child Maltreatmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…20 Kinship care is relatively cost-effective and may keep children more connected with their families, communities, and cultures compared with nonkinship care. 24,25 Multiple studies suggest specific advantages when children are placed with members of their birth family. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] In a systematic review, authors found that children placed in kinship foster care experienced fewer behavioral problems, mental health disorders, and placement disruptions compared with their counterparts in nonkinship care.…”
Section: Kinship Carementioning
confidence: 99%