1938
DOI: 10.1097/00000441-193812000-00025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The History of Bacteriology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 444 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…He was a keen observer and an outstanding maker of microscopes, and his observations and detailed illustrations of microbial life prompted many other observers (both scientists and nonscientists) to take an interest in the microscopic world. His colorful descriptions of bacteria made their study compelling; in his descriptions of the many shapes of the bacteria he sampled from his teeth, he marveled that one "shot through the water like a pike does through water" (30), firmly establishing that these tiny objects were, indeed, alive. For 200 years, microscopy enabled microbiologists to view heterotrophs, autotrophs, and obligate parasites alike.…”
Section: Early Microbiology and The Microscopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…He was a keen observer and an outstanding maker of microscopes, and his observations and detailed illustrations of microbial life prompted many other observers (both scientists and nonscientists) to take an interest in the microscopic world. His colorful descriptions of bacteria made their study compelling; in his descriptions of the many shapes of the bacteria he sampled from his teeth, he marveled that one "shot through the water like a pike does through water" (30), firmly establishing that these tiny objects were, indeed, alive. For 200 years, microscopy enabled microbiologists to view heterotrophs, autotrophs, and obligate parasites alike.…”
Section: Early Microbiology and The Microscopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…He further characterized Klein as undiplomatic, blunt, and unpopular. Bulloch (1938) emphasized Klein's individual, dogmatic, and polemic character. Richards (1987) tried to place Klein's approaches into the context provided by a European attitude to his vivisections and showed that the same experiments were being conducted by physiologists on the European mainland at the same time as those working in Britain, even though public attitudes differed considerably between the two localities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some writers, such as Bulloch (1938) and Keilin (1966), have held that von Liebig and his colleagues considered the publications on fermentation by Cagniard-Latour, Kützing and Schwann were reactionary and a blow against the idea that processes associated with living things were chemical ones. However, others (McKie, 1944;Lipman, 1967) have drawn attention to the same chemists' continued adherence to the concept of a 'vital force' (Lebenskraft).…”
Section: Von Liebig (1839) Summarized Their Views As Follows (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%