1974
DOI: 10.2307/1340045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Historical Foundations of Modern Contract Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contract law, for example, will theory reflected the psychological assumption that individual “wills” or “psyches” were the primary causal agents of behavior. As legal historian Morton Horwitz (1974) observed, 19th-century jurists rejected the long-standing belief, that a contract was to be evaluated in terms of its inherent justice or fairness, and substituted instead “the convergence of the wills of the contracting parties” as the measure of legal validity (p. 917). Indeed, the model of the autonomous legal person was so central to the notion of the contract that Grant Gilmore (1974) argued that the transformation from “nineteenth century individualism to the [modern] welfare state” (p. 96) had led to what he described as the “death of contract law.” Similarly, Leonard Levy (1957) characterized 19th-century criminal law as reflecting a “pervasive individualism” which established the legal view that “guilt, like sin, is personal because each man is the captain of his own conduct… .…”
Section: Psychological Individualism Contextualism and The Paradigm C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contract law, for example, will theory reflected the psychological assumption that individual “wills” or “psyches” were the primary causal agents of behavior. As legal historian Morton Horwitz (1974) observed, 19th-century jurists rejected the long-standing belief, that a contract was to be evaluated in terms of its inherent justice or fairness, and substituted instead “the convergence of the wills of the contracting parties” as the measure of legal validity (p. 917). Indeed, the model of the autonomous legal person was so central to the notion of the contract that Grant Gilmore (1974) argued that the transformation from “nineteenth century individualism to the [modern] welfare state” (p. 96) had led to what he described as the “death of contract law.” Similarly, Leonard Levy (1957) characterized 19th-century criminal law as reflecting a “pervasive individualism” which established the legal view that “guilt, like sin, is personal because each man is the captain of his own conduct… .…”
Section: Psychological Individualism Contextualism and The Paradigm C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some trace the origins of business ethics back to the sixteenth century protestant reformation and the subsequent pursuit of profit in the rise of mercantilism, imperialism, physiocracy, industrialization and early capitalism. Vogel (1991, p. 102) simplifies this origin story to “Protestantism made business ethics possible”, but it is much more historically accurate to say that a divergence became possible between business and ethics, whereby the British and Early American legal bedrock of fair and equitable exchange, intrinsic value and enforcement via substantive justice gave way to the radically different needs of contract law in a speculative market economy (Horowitz, 1974). It is ironic that the reform movement intended to break from entrenched religious institutional corruption ultimately led to a far more pervasive corporate form of legal and economic corruption.…”
Section: The Business Ethics Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The legal role is often understated in the broader narrative of corporate rights. Horowitz (1974, pp. 918-919) amplifies this voice:…”
Section: The Business Ethics Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simpson's and Lobban's targets include scholars such as Morton Horwitz, Richard Posner, and Patrick Atiyah. Horwitz argued that the law of contract was transformed between the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries from a doctrine concerned with the fairness of the exchange (and hence antagonistic to the commercial classes) to one that became an instrument of the commercial classes and of class oppression (Horwitz 1974). Posner also viewed the law of contract and tort through an instrumentalist lens—regarding the common law as promoting efficiency and the new industrializing economy (a kind of economic determinism) (Posner 1973).…”
Section: Telling the History Of The Law Itselfmentioning
confidence: 99%