2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00191-005-0253-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The historical development of the consumption of sweeteners - a learning approach

Abstract: From a theoretical point of view, addressing the adoption of novelty and change in consumption is a topic of major interest since it challenges the axiomatic foundations of modern microeconomics. Starting from the “continuity hypothesis” which considers the evolution of culture to be based on biological evolution, an evolutionary approach is presented which highlights the role of consumer learning. By means of a case study on the complex consumption history of sweeteners, it is shown that this approach complem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…food stuffs made with low-calorie, artificial sweeteners. Satiation is postponed and so is market saturation (see Ruprecht 2005). Diet Coke is a prominent example.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…food stuffs made with low-calorie, artificial sweeteners. Satiation is postponed and so is market saturation (see Ruprecht 2005). Diet Coke is a prominent example.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the two types of characteristics are connected by a production 31 For a comprehensive survey of this approach which aims at explaining how artefacts emerge and how they evolve see Saviotti (1996). 32 In this respect it resembles Kelvin Lancaster's (1966aLancaster's ( , 1966bLancaster's ( , 1971) 'indirect utility approach' which also is based upon a production metaphor (for a discussion see Ruprecht 2005). …”
Section: Appendix 1: the Saviottian Concept Of An Artifactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without the possibility of need satisfaction, a thing simply remains a thing. It is possible, of course, that one 1 This characteristic makes Menger's definition different from the Lancasterian (1966aLancasterian ( ,1966bLancasterian ( , 1971) and the Saviottian (1996) definitions of a consumer good (for the former see Ruprecht (2005), for the latter see appendix #0511 consumption item satisfies even more than one need. For instance, a car can be regarded as a prestige object and, for example, as a means of getting excitement or cognitive arousal by its speed.…”
Section: Condition 1: Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations