2004
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The histologic subtype of ovarian tumors affects the detection rate by pelvic washings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
31
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
2
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, widely varying figures have been reported regarding its sensitivity for peritoneal involvement in ovarian tumors [1]. Also, studies regarding the accuracy of PW cytopathology, as evaluated in comparison with final histopathologic findings, have been strikingly discordant [1]. For example, some studies reported false-negative cytopathology in the presence of disseminated peritoneal disease in a range of 20–85% of cases [12,13,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, widely varying figures have been reported regarding its sensitivity for peritoneal involvement in ovarian tumors [1]. Also, studies regarding the accuracy of PW cytopathology, as evaluated in comparison with final histopathologic findings, have been strikingly discordant [1]. For example, some studies reported false-negative cytopathology in the presence of disseminated peritoneal disease in a range of 20–85% of cases [12,13,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its introduction more than 50 years ago, the PW has gained widespread acceptance and is used routinely at most centers. However, widely varying figures have been reported regarding its sensitivity for peritoneal involvement in ovarian tumors [1]. Also, studies regarding the accuracy of PW cytopathology, as evaluated in comparison with final histopathologic findings, have been strikingly discordant [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fadare et al, reported 25% and Rubin et al, reported 30% detection rate, while Colgan et al, revealed 50% detection rate. [8][9][10] As much as 90% positive cytology detection rate has also been reported in a study. 11 This can be due to the inclusion of ascitic fluid along with peritoneal washings, as ascitic fluid has a much higher rate of detecting malignant cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Fadare et al, reported 71.4% of serous carcinoma (n = 57), 55 % of endometrioid carcinoma (n = 30), 20% of clear cell carcinoma (n = 19), and 50 % of mucinous carcinoma (n = 13) showing positive peritoneal cytology. 8 Similar study by Rubin et al, analyzed 96 cases of ovarian tumors of which 29 cases showed positive peritoneal washing cytology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%