The Hiroshima/Nagasaki Survivor Studies: Discrepancies Between Results and General Perception

Abstract

The explosion of atom bombs over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 resulted in very high casualties, both immediate and delayed but also left a large number of survivors who had been exposed to radiation, at levels that could be fairly precisely ascertained. Extensive follow-up of a large cohort of survivors (120,000) and of their offspring (77,000) was initiated in 1947 and continues to this day. In essence, survivors having received 1 Gy irradiation (1000 mSV) have a significantly elevated rate of cancer (42% increase) but a limited decrease of longevity (1 year), while their offspring show no increased frequency of abnormalities and, so far, no detectable elevation of the mutation rate. Current acceptable exposure levels for the general population and for workers in the nuclear industry have largely been derived from these studies, which have been reported in more than 100 publications. Yet the general public, and indeed most scientists, are unaware of these data: it is widely believed that irradiated survivors suffered a very high cancer burden and dramatically shortened life span, and that their progeny were affected by elevated mutation rates and frequent abnormalities. In this article, I summarize the results and discuss possible reasons for this very striking discrepancy between the facts and general beliefs about this situation.

In vivo animal studies help achieve international consensus on standards and guidelines for health risk estimates for chronic exposure to low levels of tritium in drinking water

“…Although this radionuclide is not considered highly toxic, tritium has received international attention because of public concerns over its release, mostly in water, to the environment and any resulting potential health impacts (AGIR, ; CNSC, ; ASN, ; Stack, ). Because of the prevailing public perception of nuclear (but not natural and medical) radiation as “a mysterious, unequivocally hazardous and deadly force that needs to be avoided at any cost” (Jordan, ), public tolerance of radiation releases is poor.…”

Radiation mitigation of the intestinal acute radiation injury in mice by 1-[(4-nitrophenyl)sulfonyl]-4-phenylpiperazine

“…Nuclear accidents, terrorist attacks with dirty bombs, or deployed nuclear weapons will potentially expose large numbers of the general public and first responders to substantial doses of ionizing radiation. 27 Even in developed countries, the resulting number of victims suffering from ARS will outnumber the capacity of facilities able to provide highend supportive care or bone marrow transplants. 28 Providing care for an overwhelming number of people that would be exposed to radiation in such a scenario would be further complicated by the necessity to deliver treatment as early as possible after exposure.…”

Letter to the Editor on “The Hiroshima/Nagasaki Survivor Studies: Discrepancies Between Results and General Perception” by Bertrand R. Jordan

“…n his recent article Jordan (2016) addresses the public's "unreasonable" fears of radiation. He claims that the lifespan study (LSS) of Japanese A-bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki has given definitive information on the relation between exposure and genetic damage, expressed as cancer and heritable effects in offspring of those exposed.…”