1985
DOI: 10.1016/0012-821x(85)90099-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Himalayan Arc: large-scale continental subduction, oroclinal bending and back-arc spreading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
107
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Northward convergence, anticlockwise rotation against Eurasia and oblique convergence against the Southeast Asia (DEWEY and BIRD, 1970;FITCH, 1970;SEEBER et al, 1981;LE DAIN et al, 1984;KLOOTWIJK et al, 1985;MAUNG, 1987;KHAN, 2005b) characterise the journey of the Indian plate since the Cretaceous period, and have led to the development of complicated tectonics in the northeast part of India. According to CURRAY (1989), the situation became even more complex near the syntaxis where the three plates viz., Indian, Eurasian and the Burma platelet, joined together and, accordingly, the deformational style changed from dextral shear, between India and Southeast Asia in the east, to a frontal collision at the eastern Himalayas.…”
Section: Tectonic Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Northward convergence, anticlockwise rotation against Eurasia and oblique convergence against the Southeast Asia (DEWEY and BIRD, 1970;FITCH, 1970;SEEBER et al, 1981;LE DAIN et al, 1984;KLOOTWIJK et al, 1985;MAUNG, 1987;KHAN, 2005b) characterise the journey of the Indian plate since the Cretaceous period, and have led to the development of complicated tectonics in the northeast part of India. According to CURRAY (1989), the situation became even more complex near the syntaxis where the three plates viz., Indian, Eurasian and the Burma platelet, joined together and, accordingly, the deformational style changed from dextral shear, between India and Southeast Asia in the east, to a frontal collision at the eastern Himalayas.…”
Section: Tectonic Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative models now place the continental collision as late as 34 Ma [Aitchison et al, 2007]. Such models link the first slowdown in India-Eurasia convergence after 60 Ma to an initial collision with a NeoTethyan intraoceanic island arc, followed by continentcontinent collision closer to $40 Ma [Aitchison et al, 2007;Davis et al, 2002;Hafkenscheid et al, 2006;Klootwijk et al, 1985;Van der Voo et al, 1999b]. We test two end-member plate kinematic scenarios of the India-Eurasia collision to identify whether long-lived Andean style subduction at the Eurasian margin implied by conventional models can account for the subducted slabs observed in seismic tomography of the mantle, or whether a Meso-and Neo-Tethyan back-arc basin, proposed in alternative models, is necessary to reproduce the presentday mantle structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Either result implies that India's deceleration took place several million years later than collision. Klootwijk et al (1985) synthesized the preceding observations into a model suggesting that suturing migrated eastward during the Paleocene and was completed by the early Eocene. Further convergence was accommodated by lateral extrusion of continental blocks in a manner similar to the analog clay models of Tapponnier et al (1986), followed by oroclinal bending and continental underthrusting since the late Miocene.…”
Section: Results From Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%