“…The use of immersive VR helped many to move past simply checking boxes on a list of standard requirements to fully consider the importance of human experience when designing accessible spaces (Perez Liebergesell et al, 2021). A prior study conducted by Chan (2020) supports this notion and explored students using immersive VR for environment design for users of wheelchairs and found that participants’ assessment of how well their design addressed the needs of the disabled decreased after seeing their design in an immersive virtual space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, students often struggle when interpreting two-dimensional (2D)-based ADA learning resources into three-dimensional (3D) spatial information, as they lack the knowledge to understand or transform 2D information into 3D spatial attributes while accurately visualizing design solutions at the correct real scale (Pober & Cook, 2019). Also, students may have a limited understanding of the difficulties that individuals with disabilities might experience (Perez Liebergesell et al, 2021). Therefore, the ADA Standards have often been perceived primarily as mandatory requirements rather than as means to encourage innovative design solutions for users who have special needs.…”
Despite the benefits of virtual reality (VR), there has been limited exploration of how immersive VR can be implemented in interior design course content and how students perceive its use. For this study, we investigated how an immersive VR tool can be incorporated into the interior design studio to support second-year students’ ( n = 18) design process and outcomes and examined its perceived usability (i.e., measured as usefulness, ease of use, enjoyment, and intention to use) for accessible space design. We also explored VR’s impact on advancing the interaction with space, understanding spatial information and problem-solving (PS), and how students accept the use of this technology. The students used immersive VR throughout the design process for one semester and then participated in a questionnaire. We found that immersive VR is helpful by enhancing students’ interaction with the designed space, developing better spatial understanding, and advancing PS. VR was also perceived to be highly enjoyable and moderately improved job performance but was slightly less easy to use. Participants showed a high intention to utilize VR, and spatial interaction and perceived enjoyment were significantly associated with that intention. Our findings suggest that immersive VR has potential benefits for teaching and learning accessible design and can be used more generally in diverse contexts of interior design pedagogy. While these results are promising, continued research to more effectively adopt the use of this technology in the interior design studio is needed.
“…The use of immersive VR helped many to move past simply checking boxes on a list of standard requirements to fully consider the importance of human experience when designing accessible spaces (Perez Liebergesell et al, 2021). A prior study conducted by Chan (2020) supports this notion and explored students using immersive VR for environment design for users of wheelchairs and found that participants’ assessment of how well their design addressed the needs of the disabled decreased after seeing their design in an immersive virtual space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, students often struggle when interpreting two-dimensional (2D)-based ADA learning resources into three-dimensional (3D) spatial information, as they lack the knowledge to understand or transform 2D information into 3D spatial attributes while accurately visualizing design solutions at the correct real scale (Pober & Cook, 2019). Also, students may have a limited understanding of the difficulties that individuals with disabilities might experience (Perez Liebergesell et al, 2021). Therefore, the ADA Standards have often been perceived primarily as mandatory requirements rather than as means to encourage innovative design solutions for users who have special needs.…”
Despite the benefits of virtual reality (VR), there has been limited exploration of how immersive VR can be implemented in interior design course content and how students perceive its use. For this study, we investigated how an immersive VR tool can be incorporated into the interior design studio to support second-year students’ ( n = 18) design process and outcomes and examined its perceived usability (i.e., measured as usefulness, ease of use, enjoyment, and intention to use) for accessible space design. We also explored VR’s impact on advancing the interaction with space, understanding spatial information and problem-solving (PS), and how students accept the use of this technology. The students used immersive VR throughout the design process for one semester and then participated in a questionnaire. We found that immersive VR is helpful by enhancing students’ interaction with the designed space, developing better spatial understanding, and advancing PS. VR was also perceived to be highly enjoyable and moderately improved job performance but was slightly less easy to use. Participants showed a high intention to utilize VR, and spatial interaction and perceived enjoyment were significantly associated with that intention. Our findings suggest that immersive VR has potential benefits for teaching and learning accessible design and can be used more generally in diverse contexts of interior design pedagogy. While these results are promising, continued research to more effectively adopt the use of this technology in the interior design studio is needed.
“…Hadjiyanni (2020) advocated for CIDA standards to address “empathy,” “diversity,” and “critique” of the social, political, and physical influences affecting the design of built form. Tauke and Smith (2020), Paron (2020), Liebergesell et al (2021), and Zingoni Phielipp (2022) emphasized the use of inclusive design processes to promote social justice and freedom, particularly for people who are subject to oppressive hierarchies. While these viewpoints discuss the urgency for educators to challenge our institutional systems and accreditation bodies, they do not highlight the modes and pathways educators can take in their coursework to structurally change the discourse and produce active participants and leaders in society.…”
Section: Our Silent Pedagogy and Systemsmentioning
We have witnessed much these past few years. Let us pause to consider our lived experience starting with the historical and cultural occurrences that made 2020 the year in which America was forced to confront racism, the climate crisis, and social and political polarization.February 2020: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak fuels racist attacks against Asian communities. In addition to putting xenophobia to the fore, there have been countless numbers of deaths, unemployment, and housing crises.Ahmaud Arbery was shot dead in a racist attack while jogging in Georgia.March 2020: Breonna Taylor was killed in a "no-knock" police raid.April 2020: 6.6 million Americans filed for unemployment. That month, the U.S. unemployment rate reached 14.7%, the highest since the Great Depression.May 2020: George Floyd was murdered in an encounter with police in Minneapolis, Minnesota; his last words-"I can't breathe" fueled a call for immediate global action against racism.June 2020: Atlanta, Georgia police officer shoots and kills Rayshard Brooks.August 2020: Hurricane Isaias made landfall in the U.S. mid-Atlantic and Northeast. Over 2.8 million homes and businesses lost power supply once the storm hit.California's governor declared a state of emergency as a heat wave worsened the fires. While some people were evacuated, thousands were left without power.
“…Further, Danko (2003) stated that education should nurture “personal understanding and empathy which requires individuals to develop both an inward personal consciousness and an outward social-awareness of their role in the world” (p. 82). Opening our perspectives inwardly and outwardly may allow us to reflect on our own practices of inclusion/exclusion, suggested both within interior design (Pérez Liebergesell et al, 2021; Tauke & Smith, 2020) and mindfulness practices (Sucitto, 2018).…”
Section: Mindfulness Inclusivity and Experiential Learning In Design ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rojas et al (2015) also discovered that mindfulness practices could strengthen empathic relationships by supporting a designer's inner awareness, which is essential for inclusive design. Lim et al (2021) expanded the notion of inclusive design that goes beyond the physical necessities (barrier-free and accessibility components) to account for psychosocial inclusivity, where interior designers have a significant role and responsibility (Paron, 2020;Pérez Liebergesell et al, 2021;Tauke & Smith, 2020).…”
Section: Mindfulness Inclusivity and Experiential Learning In Design ...mentioning
At the beginning of the day, in the cool of the early morning, as light and color are beginning to come back into the world, bring attention to the quality of inner space, the space in this room and the space in the world around us. Developing that attention, we notice the space that's always here, the space around things, the space within things. This helps us to recollect, to awaken to the inner space, the space of our minds which receives and contains, which encompasses all thoughts, feelings, perceptions, moods (Amaro, 2020, p. 543).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.