2017
DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2017.1415383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The (hidden) injuries of NAPLAN: two standardised test events and the making of ‘at risk’ student subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they do not present the support students receive, based on identified needs. This is consistent with previous research indicating that externally initiated assessments mainly lead to identifying students with SEN but without relating the support to teaching and learning (Allan and Artiles, 2017;Hamre et al, 2018;Mayes and Howell, 2018). The change in the assessment assignment, toward conducting analysis based on the assessment results and using this analysis as a ground for planning and improving teaching, could be seen as an attempt from the municipal school administration to better link the assessment with teaching and students' learning at group level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, they do not present the support students receive, based on identified needs. This is consistent with previous research indicating that externally initiated assessments mainly lead to identifying students with SEN but without relating the support to teaching and learning (Allan and Artiles, 2017;Hamre et al, 2018;Mayes and Howell, 2018). The change in the assessment assignment, toward conducting analysis based on the assessment results and using this analysis as a ground for planning and improving teaching, could be seen as an attempt from the municipal school administration to better link the assessment with teaching and students' learning at group level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As consistent with previous research, the results show that the externally initiated assessment assignment mainly lead to identifying students with SEN but without relating the support to teaching and learning (Allan and Artiles, 2017;Hamre et al, 2018;Mayes and Howell, 2018). The measures are primarily directed at the individual student in form of special education, performed by SEN-teacher.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since then, students in Australia in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 have sat the Reading, Writing, Language Conventions (spelling, grammar and punctuation) and Numeracy tests annually, and this continues. While purported to be a low stakes method of data collection, Mayes and Howell (2018) contest that the way in which the NAPLAN data has been used (performance comparisons, policy direction, league tables published in the media) is consistent with high-stakes testing. Criticism about NAPLAN has been consistent since its inception, and while exploring all of the issues is beyond the scope of this paper, one issue does need to be unpacked in a discussion about IE -access to and participation in the tests.…”
Section: Naplan: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a risk that students "begin to see themselves in terms of evaluative hierarchies" (Gergen & Dixon-Román, 2014, p. 13), identifying with labels such as superiors, average, and undesirable. The relationship between an increased number of assessments and low-achieving students has been discussed in terms of inclusion, exclusion, and categorization Mayes & Howell, 2017). Systematic assessments have enabled the identification of students with special needs, sometimes with the intention of categorizing .…”
Section: Assessments In Educational Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%