2017
DOI: 10.5334/bha-583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hidden History of a Third of the World: the Collective Biography of Australian and International Archaeology in the Pacific (CBAP) Project

Abstract: The paper introduces a recently commenced five-year research project on the history of Pacific archaeology, the Collective Biography of Archaeology in the Pacific (CBAP) Project. The justification for the project, the background to it, its aims and some discussion of its initial stages and anticipated outcomes are given. At time of writing CBAP has been going for barely a year and so only a brief mention will be made of the research carried out so far during the initial establishment period.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, decolonisation can and should involve a critical self-consciousness of disciplinary history, a consideration that has been at the heart of the Collective Biography of Archaeology in the Pacific (CBAP) Project from its inception (Spriggs 2016).…”
Section: Looking Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, decolonisation can and should involve a critical self-consciousness of disciplinary history, a consideration that has been at the heart of the Collective Biography of Archaeology in the Pacific (CBAP) Project from its inception (Spriggs 2016).…”
Section: Looking Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was noted in the 2017 paper laying out the justification for, and background to, the Australian Research Council-funded Collective Biography of Archaeology in the Pacific Laureate Project (henceforth CBAP), that the Pacific and Island Southeast Asian regions had hitherto been almost completely absent from world histories of archaeology (Spriggs 2017a). CBAP had as an anticipated outcome to change this situation through examination and exposition of the forgotten networks of influence linking Pacific scholars to the metropoles of Europe and America, giving Pacific archaeology its proper place with the much more established histories of Pacific anthropology and of Australian archaeology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consolidated historiographical research about Pacific archaeology is still a very recent enterprise (Spriggs 2017;Dotte-Sarout et al 2020;Jones et al forthcoming). 1 Just as important consideration has been given to non-Anglophone traditions and literature, highlighting the role of 'hidden' figures-namely indigenous collaborators and women engaged in the disciplinehas been part of the new historiographical agenda in the region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%