Oxford Handbooks Online 2015
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199337538.013.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hidden Family Lives of Single Adults Without Dependent Children

Abstract: This chapter reviews the literature on the family and personal demands of single workers without dependent children. Also discussed are findings from an interview study examining how singles without dependent children manage work and nonwork. Results of both the literature review and interviews suggest that singles without dependent children have a variety of family, relationship, and personal demands, which often compete with work, leading to interrole conflict. Moreover, most interview participants indicated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distinction between narrow and broad conceptualisations of the nonwork domain hint to an ongoing debate in the work‐nonwork field, which has been acknowledged by several authors over the years (e.g., Bennett, Beehr, & Ivanitskaya, ; Casper, Marquardt, Roberto, & Buss, ; Parasuraman & Greenhaus, ; Huffman et al, ; Rothausen, ). We contribute to this debate by drawing on shared meanings of what constitutes nonwork and the points of disagreement among scholars about the use of various nonwork terms (e.g., family or home).…”
Section: Discussion and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distinction between narrow and broad conceptualisations of the nonwork domain hint to an ongoing debate in the work‐nonwork field, which has been acknowledged by several authors over the years (e.g., Bennett, Beehr, & Ivanitskaya, ; Casper, Marquardt, Roberto, & Buss, ; Parasuraman & Greenhaus, ; Huffman et al, ; Rothausen, ). We contribute to this debate by drawing on shared meanings of what constitutes nonwork and the points of disagreement among scholars about the use of various nonwork terms (e.g., family or home).…”
Section: Discussion and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, changes in technology and work arrangements, increases in the number of female workers and dual‐earner couples, and other changes in employee demographics led to a proliferation of work‐nonwork terminologies; hence, work‐nonwork scholarship evolved to embrace and theorise the positive view. Future work‐nonwork theorists might consider the increasing prevalence of the internet, the constant connectedness experienced by workers (e.g., Christensen, ; Wajcman & Rose, ), and the fading boundaries between work and family. These developments call for enhanced integration between work and family (e.g., Ashforth et al, ), and for models that accommodate contemporary work‐nonwork interface modes.…”
Section: Discussion and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These negative reactions are likely to have a detrimental effect on the organisation. Several studies point out that single workers without dependent children also have families (Casper and DePaulo, 2012;Casper et al, 2016). Participant 25 above spoke of being unable to visit parents, siblings, and other relatives at a key time of the year.…”
Section: Backlash Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, while significant research has been undertaken on WLB in Western developed nations (Wilkinson et al, 2017) and Asian countries (Rajadhyaksha, 2012), little is known about WLB challenges and experiences in an African context such as Nigeria. Despite the paucity of research on the WLB of singles (Casper and DePaulo, 2012), WLB is just as important to them as it is to workers who are married and have familial responsibilities (Casper et al, 2016). As Collins (2008) has argued, certain jobs (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women receive strong social signals to prioritise family caregiving, and such expectations are not confined to wives and mothers. Single female employees without children also report caregiving responsibilities for parents, siblings or other relatives (Casper et al, ), an experience that may also be shared by a female supervisor, regardless of her parental and marital status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%