2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hidden cost of informal care: An empirical study on female caregivers' subjective well-being

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These associations, estimated using FE modelling in which each person is their own control, were also robust to inclusion of timevarying socio-demographic and health covariates which might confound the relationship between providing care and quality of life. The findings provide additional support for prior research which found negative impacts on carer wellbeing and quality of life of caregiving (Chen et al 2019;Pinquart and Sörensen 2003;van den Berg et al 2014). That in none of the analyses, even with this large sample, were we able to show that providing informal care was positive for carer quality of life counters recent claims about potential benefits of caregiving.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These associations, estimated using FE modelling in which each person is their own control, were also robust to inclusion of timevarying socio-demographic and health covariates which might confound the relationship between providing care and quality of life. The findings provide additional support for prior research which found negative impacts on carer wellbeing and quality of life of caregiving (Chen et al 2019;Pinquart and Sörensen 2003;van den Berg et al 2014). That in none of the analyses, even with this large sample, were we able to show that providing informal care was positive for carer quality of life counters recent claims about potential benefits of caregiving.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Turning to population-based studies examining wellbeing and quality of life, the picture is mixed, including negative impacts of caregiving (Broek and Grundy 2018;Chen et al 2019;Hirst 2005;van den Berg et al 2014;Verbakel et al 2017Verbakel et al , 2018, no significant effects (McMunn et al 2009;Wahrendorf and Siegrist 2010), negative effects only for specific subgroups (Hansen et al 2013;Lacey et al 2019;Zaninotto et al 2013), or even positive effects (Hansen et al 2013;McMunn et al 2009). One reason for such heterogeneity might be differences in study design, in particular the degree to which selection into caregiving has been controlled for.…”
Section: Potential Impact Of Caregiving Upon Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nurse, whose marital status is married/cohabitation, may receive more material and spiritual support from their partners to help them cope with life pressure and negative emotions, which leads to higher SWB (Chen and van Ours, 2018). As the previous study presented, with long weekly work time and heavy workload, caregivers are prone to negative emotions, which may impair mental health, decrease the level of SWB (Chen et al, 2019). More than 50% of nurses had weekly work time over 40 h, which exceeded the domestic standard in China.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al (2015) found the association between higher educational level, being married/cohabitation and higher level of SWB. Another study reported working too many hours per week reduced SWB of Chinese female caregivers (Chen et al, 2019). The influence of income on SWB was also demonstrated (Zhang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%