2009
DOI: 10.4135/9781526461957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hewlett-Packard and Compaq Merger: A Case Study in Business Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While advanced decomposition algorithms (called SSDP in [35]) have solved efficiently the deterministic counterpart of 1|| j T j , the robust counterpart cannot benefit from these techniques because the binary variables would depend on each vector p ∈ U . Specifically, the resulting formulation would have a pseudo-polynomial number of variables for each p ∈ U , making SSDP completely unrealistic [14]. Finally, notice that we also disregard the disjunctive constraints formulation (see [5]).…”
Section: Milp Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While advanced decomposition algorithms (called SSDP in [35]) have solved efficiently the deterministic counterpart of 1|| j T j , the robust counterpart cannot benefit from these techniques because the binary variables would depend on each vector p ∈ U . Specifically, the resulting formulation would have a pseudo-polynomial number of variables for each p ∈ U , making SSDP completely unrealistic [14]. Finally, notice that we also disregard the disjunctive constraints formulation (see [5]).…”
Section: Milp Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, ample anecdotal evidence suggests that managers often make costly attempts to rationalize their actions and influence the opinions or beliefs of shareholders, analysts, and investors through voluntary disclosures-via the media, letters to shareholders, advertisements, telemarketers' phone calls, or costly road shows. In particular, managers often justify actions relating to expansions, scale backs, changes in payout policy, and their firms' competitive strategies (e.g., Soter, Brigham, and Evanson [1996], Bergstein [2002], DeTienne and Hoopes [2004], Lang and Lundholm [2000]). 1 Such resource allocation implications of voluntary disclosure have received little attention in the literature, which, for the most part, has focused on the valuation implications of disclosure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%