The heterogeneity problem in meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) revisited: A reply to Cheung.

Yu, Jia; Downes, Patrick E.; Carter, Kameron M.; O’Boyle, Ernest H.

doi:10.1037/apl0000328

Cited by 19 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We considered a number of multivariate tests using meta‐regression and meta‐analytic structural equation modeling. Although these tests are commonly employed in meta‐analyses, recent concerns over their validity when (a) the number of included studies is small (Viechtbauer, López‐López, Sánchez‐Meca, & Marín‐Martínez, 2015), (b) there are large amounts of true score variance (Yu, Downes, Carter, & O'Boyle, 2016), and (c) underlying assumptions are violated (e.g., Lv & Maeda, 2019; Yu, Downes, Carter, & O'Boyle, 2018) raise serious concerns over their appropriateness in many organizational behavior and human resource contexts.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Passion at work: A meta‐analysis of individual work outcomes

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Academic research on passion is much more complex than the extant literature or popular press portray. Although research on work-related passion has progressed rapidly over the last decade, much remains unknown. We are now just beginning to recognize the different theoretical underpinnings and empirical operationalizations that work passion research has adopted, and the confusion this has generated hampers our understanding of the construct and its relationship to workplace outcomes. Accordingly, we use a meta-analytic examination to study the work-related outcomes of three dominant literature streams of work passion: general passion, dualistic passion (i.e., harmonious passion and obsessive passion), and role-based passion (i.e., passion for developing, passion for founding, and passion for inventing). We employ meta-analytic techniques using random effects modeling summarizing 106 distinct samples across 87 manuscripts totaling 384 effect sizes (total unique N = 38,481; 43.54% women, average age is 38.04).Importantly, we highlight how each of the three streams of passion relates to various outcomes differently, illuminate several important heretofore undetected nuances in passion research, and provide a roadmap for future inquiry on passion at work. K E Y W O R D S dualistic model of passion, entrepreneurial passion, general work passion, meta-analysis, rolebased passion

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Passion at work: A meta‐analysis of individual work outcomes

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This differs from the MASEM approach which is based on a correlation matrix of average effect sizes across different subpopulations. However, there was a statistical error (i.e., NPD: nonpositive definitive) when we used the FIMASEM approach to test our final model with cognitive and skill-based outcomes separated (see the discussion of Cheung [2018] and Yu et al [2018] about the NPD issue). To address the NPD issue, Cheung (2018) suggested replacing near positive definite matrices with NPD matrices in the two-stage FIMASEM (TS-FIMASEM) approach.…”

Section: Random-effects Fimasem Analytic Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is it time to update and expand training motivation theory? A meta-analytic review of training motivation research in the 21st century.

Chung¹,

Zhan²,

Noe³

et al. 2022

Journal of Applied Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

theory based on meta-analysis and model testing has served as the foundation for our understanding of training motivation. However, the applicability of the theory today may be limited for several reasons. There has been significant growth in training motivation research since Colquitt et al. (Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85, p. 678) proposed and tested their theory. Also, advances in meta-analysis and model testing allow for a more complete and rigorous test of the theory than was previously possible. As a result, we propose and test a contemporary and comprehensive theory of training motivation based on Colquitt et al. (Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85, p. 678) and other studies conducted over the last 20 years. To do so, we conducted an updated meta-analytic review of 167 independent studies and tested a mediation model of training motivation theory using both conventional meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) and full-information MASEM (FIMASEM). The results support a partially mediated model of training motivation that includes additional antecedents (e.g., openness to experience, extroversion, agreeableness, and goal orientation) and learning outcomes (e.g., turnover intentions and job satisfaction) not included in Colquitt et al. (Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85, p. 678). In addition, we conducted exploratory analyses to understand the relative importance of the antecedents of both motivation to learn and learning outcomes and the moderating role of training and studying characteristics on the relationships between motivation to learn and its antecedents and consequences. Finally, the authors discuss the implications of the results for theory, practice, and future research directions.

show abstract

“…Second, Cheung (2018) shows that FIMASEM can be used to quantify the heterogeneity of the parameters with credible intervals. However, the validity of the indices of generalizability is questionable (see Yu, Downes, Carter, & O’Boyle, 2018, for the reply).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological Ownership: A Meta-Analysis and Comparison of Multiple Forms of Attachment in the Workplace

Zhang

Liu

Zhang

et al. 2020

Journal of Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This quantitative review systematically integrates the antecedents and outcomes of psychological ownership (PO) and examines its incremental validity and explanatory power compared with two other forms of workplace attachment (i.e., organizational commitment and organizational identification). Across 141 studies published over 20 years, our meta-analysis shows that apart from the factors related to the three traditional categories of PO antecedents (i.e., control, knowing, and investment), safety (e.g., organizational justice, trust, perceived organizational support, and relational closeness) is an emerging antecedent leading to PO. In addition, we find that PO is related not only to employees’ attitudinal and performance outcomes but also to some dark-side outcomes (e.g., territorial behaviors). Furthermore, after applying two advanced methods, that is, two-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling and dominance analysis, to the analysis of 294 studies (including 291 primary studies and three published meta-analyses), the results reveal that PO has an incremental validity above that of organizational commitment and organizational identification in predicting employees’ in-role performance and organizational citizenship behaviors. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

show abstract

The heterogeneity problem in meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) revisited: A reply to Cheung.

Cited by 19 publications

References 27 publications

Passion at work: A meta‐analysis of individual work outcomes

Passion at work: A meta‐analysis of individual work outcomes

Is it time to update and expand training motivation theory? A meta-analytic review of training motivation research in the 21st century.

Psychological Ownership: A Meta-Analysis and Comparison of Multiple Forms of Attachment in the Workplace

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About