1966
DOI: 10.1177/104438946604701002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Heroin Addict's Pseudoassertive Behavior and Family Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have looked at the heroin addict both within the family of origin (addict, siblings, parents, grandparents) and, to a lesser extent, the family of procreation (spouse or marital system). Concerning the former, reviews of the literature describe a generalized pattern for male addict families in which the mother is involved in an indulgent, overprotective, overly permissive relationship with the addict, who is put in the position of a favored chdd; he is reported by the mother to have been the "easiest to raise" of the children and generally "good" as a child (Ganger & Shugart, 1966;Torda, 1968). Fathers of male addicts are reported to be detached, uninvolved, weak, or absent.…”
Section: (Continued From Front Cover)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have looked at the heroin addict both within the family of origin (addict, siblings, parents, grandparents) and, to a lesser extent, the family of procreation (spouse or marital system). Concerning the former, reviews of the literature describe a generalized pattern for male addict families in which the mother is involved in an indulgent, overprotective, overly permissive relationship with the addict, who is put in the position of a favored chdd; he is reported by the mother to have been the "easiest to raise" of the children and generally "good" as a child (Ganger & Shugart, 1966;Torda, 1968). Fathers of male addicts are reported to be detached, uninvolved, weak, or absent.…”
Section: (Continued From Front Cover)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganger and Shugart (1966) investigated the use of family therapy with over 100 male addicts and found that successful treatment with this population required family involvement. Stanton and associates (1982) argued for family involvement based upon several studies with addicted families, as do Kaufman and Kaufman (1979).…”
Section: Theoretical Issues With Systems Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other considerations are also important. It is almost universally accepted by those who have studied compulsive drug use in families that the drug‐taking of one member is often overlooked by relatives; it may even be either openly or covertly encouraged (12, 49, 61, 80, 90, 104, 112, 132, 135). Further, not only can the drug‐taking pattern be supported and maintained by the system, but the family may actually work to sabotage those treatment efforts that begin to succeed in reducing or eliminating it.…”
Section: Approaches To Treatment: Technique and Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another early paper, Hirsh (64) described a group of five parents in which the participants resisted being labeled patients themselves and preferred to regard the group as a class or lecture program from which they could obtain advice. Ganger and Shugart (49) met with two groups of addicts' mothers but did not present their techniques. Amendolara (4) described the evolution of a mothers' group for suburban drug‐using youth into a large parents' group; she felt it was helpful and essential for treatment success.…”
Section: Approaches To Treatment: Technique and Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation