1978
DOI: 10.1029/ja083ia12p05741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The height dependence of wave‐normal depression and disturbance amplitude in TID's

Abstract: Experimental results obtained with multistation rapid‐run ionosondes are presented and discussed for seven large daytime traveling ionospheric disturbances (TID's). There is a sharp maximum in the amplitude of each disturbance in the inflection region of the electron density profile below the F layer peak, and the wave normal is depressed downward in this region from 55° to 85° below the horizontal. At the upper and lower fringes of the disturbance the wave‐normal depression is much less, ranging from 2° to 25… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as mentioned above, the sensitivity of GNSS TEC measurements to small electron density fluctuations caused by the passage of TIDs may present a concern, since the major contribution to the TEC is from the topside of the ionosphere. It is known that TID amplitudes maximize near or below the background electron density maximum hmF2 (e.g., Morgan & Ballard, 1978). Therefore, we wanted to verify the results obtained with the GNSS technique by comparing them to independent measurements, that is, HF observations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as mentioned above, the sensitivity of GNSS TEC measurements to small electron density fluctuations caused by the passage of TIDs may present a concern, since the major contribution to the TEC is from the topside of the ionosphere. It is known that TID amplitudes maximize near or below the background electron density maximum hmF2 (e.g., Morgan & Ballard, 1978). Therefore, we wanted to verify the results obtained with the GNSS technique by comparing them to independent measurements, that is, HF observations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ray tracing does account for the refraction which can be determined even for a more physical TID modulation of the background ionosphere than that given in equation . For example, an increasing TID amplitude with height [e.g., Morgan and Ballard , ] can be used or even a tilted TID wave front as suggested by the density contour plot in Figure . The mirror model also fails for near‐vertical incidence when Spitze reflection in the ionosphere [ Poeverlein, ] significantly changes the takeoff and arrival angles from those predicted by a free‐space mirror reflection.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%