“…I hope that even in this condensed reading of what is actually an endlessly fascinating and contradictory text, I have been able to illustrate that Blind's The Ascent of Man does more than merely aiming ‘to reshape Darwinism into an optimistic vision of human and universal development’, as Gregory Tate suggests (2017, 109). Even though the scientific ‘validity’ – by whichever standards this may be adjudicated – of her evolutionary fantasy may be questionable, and John Holmes's objection that ‘to hold out the promise that, through us, nature will transcend both itself and our own brutality is an act of bad faith’ (2009, 54) certainly needs to be taken into account, I would still propose that The Ascent of Man , as ‘Blind's attempt to weave a new, humanist mythology from the resistant threads of Darwinian theory’ (Diedrick 2016, 314), nevertheless represents a very substantial intervention both in the interpretation and projection of evolutionary thinking and in renegotiating the function of epic poetry. Blind's analysis of the detrimental effects of an understanding of evolution which is based on, and can be used to perpetuate, notions of struggle and the survival of the fittest and the necessity to overcome those, is not limited to her poetic works.…”