The Heavenly Treasure of Sonnets 48 and 52

Stritmatter, Roger

doi:10.1093/nq/46-2-226

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Reasons For Challenging the Traditional Authorship Theory1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recent research is uncovering many literary connections between those early poems and the later works attributed to the pen name "Shakespeare." 8…”

Section: Reasons For Challenging the Traditional Authorship Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Friendly fire: Shakespeare's accidental enemies, a review of the Shakespeare authorship controversy

Waugaman

2020

Appl Psychoanal Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Some might consider Shakespeare authorship heretics (sometimes called "anti-Stratfordians") to be enemies of the author Shakespeare. However, as a Shakespeare authorship dissident myself, I will offer a different and possibly counterintuitive perspective on the topic of "Shakespeare's Enemies." Namely, that it is mainstream Shakespeare scholars who inadvertently undermine our understanding of the author Shakespeare and prevent us from making vital connections between the works and their true author. They are not enemies of the works of Shakespeare, of course, but unintentional "enemies" of our search for the truth about the author of those works. A core unexamined assumption of the traditional theory is that early references to "Shakespeare" were indisputably references to Shakespeare of Stratford, despite recent scholarship that demonstrates his Elizabethan era was a golden age of pen names and other forms of anonymous authorship. Circular thinking and other manifestations of groupthink follow in the wake of this foundational assumption. I will summarize some of the abundant evidence pointing to Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford, as the actual author of the Shakespeare canon.

show abstract

“…Recent research is uncovering many literary connections between those early poems and the later works attributed to the pen name "Shakespeare." 8…”

Section: Reasons For Challenging the Traditional Authorship Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Friendly fire: Shakespeare's accidental enemies, a review of the Shakespeare authorship controversy

Waugaman

2020

Appl Psychoanal Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Heavenly Treasure of Sonnets 48 and 52

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Friendly fire: Shakespeare's accidental enemies, a review of the Shakespeare authorship controversy

Friendly fire: Shakespeare's accidental enemies, a review of the Shakespeare authorship controversy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About