The Heaven Dictator Game: Costless taking or giving

Garcı́a-Gallego, Aurora; Georgantzı́s, Nikolaos; Ruiz-Martos, Maria

doi:10.1016/j.socec.2019.101449

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, there is evidence that incidental emotions – “the feelings that at the time of the decision are not normatively relevant for making that decision” (Lerner et al, 2015, p. 803) – can carry over from one situation to another and can affect unrelated decisions (e.g., George and Dane, 2016). Recent studies have linked emotions, in particular happiness, to outcomes such as work effort and productivity (Erez and Isen, 2002; Isen and Reeve, 2005; Oswald et al, 2015), risk aversion (Nygren et al, 1996; Nygren, 1998; Kliger and Levy, 2003; Conte et al, 2018), time preference (Ifcher and Zarghamee, 2011), and altruistic or pro‐social behavior (e.g., Kirchsteiger et al, 2006; Capra et al, 2010; Forgas and Tan, 2013; Drouvelis and Grosskopf, 2016; García‐Gallego et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Altruistic behavior and soccer: the effect of incidental happiness on charitable giving

Hubers,

Webbink

2023

Scandinavian J Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the impact of incidental happiness associated with the outcome of the Dutch national soccer championship on charitable giving shortly after the decisive match. We use survey data in which participants were asked to make an anonymous donation of an earned endowment. For estimating the causal effect of happiness on charitable giving, we exploit the variation in the emotions of fans between and within teams using two complementary empirical approaches. The first approach is based on the preference of fans for local teams. We find that individuals living closer to the city of the new champion (Amsterdam) are happier and also more likely to donate to charity than individuals living further away. Importantly, distance to Amsterdam does not impact charitable giving in a placebo sample of individuals with no interest in soccer. The second approach exploits variation between different types of fans within teams. Allegiant fans, individuals who attended a match, are happier and more likely to donate to charity than ‘stay‐home’ fans when their team wins the title. Allegiant fans are less happy and less likely to donate than ‘stay‐home’ fans when their team does not win the title. Instrumental variable estimates suggest a large effect of incidental happiness on charitable giving.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

show abstract