The Healthcare Environment

York, Tony W.; MacAlister, Don

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-420048-7.00001-5

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Later the definition has been termed to be much more upon empirical investigation. (York and MacAlister, 2015) defined academic student success as an academic achievement, satisfaction, attainment of learning objectives, acquisition of oriented skills, and post college performance. An intensive analysis on student success by (Kuh et al, 2007) concluded success is a multiple desired outcomes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment for Student Success: Delivering High-Quality Modules and Improving Educational Methods in Civil Engineering Program

Abushandi

2021

JESR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are many internal and external factors influence student success such as optimization of student support services, campus resources, teaching methods and learning outcomes achievement, and many others. Understanding student success due to the global declining quality of undergraduate engineering students is very demanding. Post training or re-educating graduates is expensive and time consuming and can be prevented by if structured educational process took a place. The aims of this study were to identify student’s success related factors and assess how a new teaching method will impact student success. Assessment of student success within civil engineering major was analyzed. After conducting the teaching method, a structured reflective questionnaire was carried out among 50 students targeting two modules namely traffic and transportation engineering from level three, and introduction to structural analysis and design from level two. Students’ satisfaction and teaching method effectiveness emerged as significant indictors of student success. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate student responses. Person correlation and Multiple Linear Regression were used to test and predict the relationships between the variables mainly gender, teaching method effectiveness, and overall evaluation. Gender plays a moderate to strong role in the response for method effectiveness indicator and overall evaluation indicators. The performance of Multiple Linear Regression was exceptionally well with very low average relative error (5%). Students are more likely to be engaged onsite rather than online to adjust their need and trigger academic support. Improving student support services, student’s engagement, and update module materials to be more problem based are recommended to ensure students success. In addition, proper student’s feedback analysis, formative and summative assessments were primary tools to improve teaching practices. Received: 26 November 2020 / Accepted: 27 January 2021 / Published: 5 March 2021

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment for Student Success: Delivering High-Quality Modules and Improving Educational Methods in Civil Engineering Program

Abushandi

2021

JESR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Study of Opinions of Healthcare Professionals on Health Transformation Program (Example Kirklareli)

Yüksel¹

2016

jisr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was conducted in order to inquire opinions of health care professionals on health transformation program. The study is cross-sectional and descriptive. Random sample was used for the study. Data for the study were collected from 297 voluntary health care professionals working at Kırklareli, Babaeski, Lüleburgaz, Pınarhisar and Vize public hospitals affiliated to Union of Public Hospitals in Kırklareli Province, where surveys of 263 participants were validated and 34 surveys were excluded.It was found out that 184 of 263 participants (69.2 %) did not have detailed knowledge on Health Transformation Program, 193 (73.3 %) did not investigate about HTP program while 68 (25.6 %) investigated about the issue. 196 participants (75.9 %) did not know 7 main titles of HTP policy and 67 (23 %) knew them. Another important question that participants answered was related to the organization that planned HTP. 252 (94.7 %) thought that it was planned by the Ministry of Health while 11 (4.1 %) responded negatively. It was found out that while n: 91, %34,6 was most used by public hospitals and n: 90, %34,2 by private hospitals for treatment, family practice was not used much with n: 23 %8,7. It was seen that people learnt about the program of Reform in Health via press and internet with n: 142 %54. While the rate of those finding the performance of SDP positive was n: 129, %49, those indicating negative opinion was n: 97 %36,9 and those who stated that they have no information was found n: 37 %14,1Findings of the present study show that healthcare professionals do not have extensive knowledge about HTP and did not attempt to learn about the program. Authors observed that they did not know the 7 main titles of the policy but knew that HTP was planned by the Ministry of Health.

show abstract

The Healthcare Environment

Cited by 2 publications

References 20 publications

Assessment for Student Success: Delivering High-Quality Modules and Improving Educational Methods in Civil Engineering Program

Assessment for Student Success: Delivering High-Quality Modules and Improving Educational Methods in Civil Engineering Program

A Study of Opinions of Healthcare Professionals on Health Transformation Program (Example Kirklareli)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About