The Health Resources and Services Administration’s Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program in rural areas of the United States: Geographic distribution, provider characteristics, and clinical outcomes

Abstract

Background People living with HIV (PLWH) residing in rural areas experience substantial barriers to HIV care, which may contribute to poor HIV health outcomes, including retention in HIV care and viral suppression. The Health Resources and Services Administration's Ryan White HIV/ AIDS Program (HRSA RWHAP) is an important source of HIV medical care and support services in rural areas. The purpose of this analysis was to (1) assess the reach of the RWHAP in rural areas of the United States, (2) compare the characteristics and funded services of RWHAP provider organizations in rural and non-rural areas, and (3) compare the characteristics and clinical outcomes of RWHAP clients accessing medical care and support services in rural and non-rural areas. Methods and findings Data for this analysis were abstracted from the 2017 RWHAP Services Report (RSR), the primary source of annual, client-level RWHAP data. Organizations funded to deliver RWHAP any service ("RWHAP providers") were categorized as rural or non-rural according to the HRSA FORHP's definition of modified Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes. RWHAP clients were categorized based on their patterns of RWHAP service use as "visited only rural providers," "visited only non-rural providers," or "visited rural and non-rural providers." In 2017, among the 2,113 providers funded by the RWHAP, 6.2% (n = 132) were located in HRSA-designated rural areas. Rural providers were funded to deliver a greater number of service categories per site than non-rural providers (44.7% funded for �5 services vs. 34.1% funded for �5 services, respectively). Providers in rural areas served fewer

Evaluation of the Impact of HIV Serostatus on the Hepatitis C Virus Care Cascade and Injection Drug Use Among Persons Initiating Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder

“…This discrepancy may be related to lower contact with health care providers among participants without HIV at baseline or lower health literacy regarding the importance of HCV screening and treatment, and thus lower motivation to undergo follow-up HCV VL testing. For instance, PWH who are uninsured or underinsured may receive Ryan White HIV/AIDS services for primary care, including HCV and OUD assessment and treatment, or essential support services [ 30 ] and undergo more frequent laboratory monitoring of HIV VL. Nevertheless, low rates of initiation onto DAA therapy were observed regardless of HIV serostatus.…”

Health care utilization and HIV clinical outcomes among newly enrolled patients following Affordable Care Act implementation in a California integrated health system: a longitudinal study

“…Insurance coverage policies relevant to HIV care may vary by state [ 50 ], limiting generalizability. The sample was drawn from a single institution in California and participants had relatively high levels of viral control relative to PWH in other settings such as Ryan White clinics [ 41 , 51 ]. However, economic barriers to service utilization for PWH with access to care are of concern in many health systems, including systems in other states and countries, and our study contributes to this important area of inquiry.…”

Health care utilization and HIV clinical outcomes following Affordable Care Act implementation in California: A longitudinal study

“…The impact of the ACA on HIV care may vary by state [49], limiting generalizability. The sample was drawn from a single institution in California and participants had relatively high levels of viral control relative to PWH in other settings such as Ryan White clinics [40,50]. However, economic barriers to service utilization for PWH with access to care are of concern in many health systems, including systems in other states and countries, and our study contributes to this important area of inquiry.…”