2016
DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2016.1161663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The health preoccupation diagnostic interview: inter-rater reliability of a structured interview for diagnostic assessment of DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder and illness anxiety disorder

Abstract: Somatic symptom disorder (SSD) and illness anxiety disorder (IAD) are two new diagnoses introduced in the DSM-5. There is a need for reliable instruments to facilitate the assessment of these disorders. We therefore developed a structured diagnostic interview, the Health Preoccupation Diagnostic Interview (HPDI), which we hypothesized would reliably differentiate between SSD, IAD, and no diagnosis. Persons with clinically significant health anxiety (n = 52) and healthy controls (n = 52) were interviewed using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder and illness anxiety disorder were assessed with the Health Preoccupation Diagnostic Interview, which exhibits excellent interrater reliability [ 12 ]. Both ICD-10 exhaustion disorder and DSM-5 adjustment disorder were assessed with a clinical interview developed specifically for the stress disorders trial that closely followed the diagnostic criteria of ICD-10 and DSM-5 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder and illness anxiety disorder were assessed with the Health Preoccupation Diagnostic Interview, which exhibits excellent interrater reliability [ 12 ]. Both ICD-10 exhaustion disorder and DSM-5 adjustment disorder were assessed with a clinical interview developed specifically for the stress disorders trial that closely followed the diagnostic criteria of ICD-10 and DSM-5 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess whether diagnostic criteria for SSD or IAD were met we used a structured diagnostic interview, the Health Preoccupation Diagnostic Interview (HPDI). 10 The HPDI covers all DSM-5 criteria of SSD and IAD and can be administered with high interrater reliability. 10 To assess the presence of other psychiatric disorders we used the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The HPDI covers all DSM-5 criteria of SSD and IAD and can be administered with high interrater reliability. 10 To assess the presence of other psychiatric disorders we used the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). 11 As a frame of reference, the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule IV (ADIS) 12 was used to establish whether participants met criteria for DSM-IV hypochondriasis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the DSM-5 emphasises the evaluation of subjects who have excessive concerns about health issues. However, the DSM-5 is clinically difficult to follow because it requires qualified and experienced physicians to conduct an interview,7 which makes clinicians in general hospitals feel less confident when treating patients who are suspected to have SSD. In particular, individuals in China and other Asian countries tend to refuse psychological counselling 4 8; thus, many patients with psychological symptoms have been treated by non-psychiatric physicians in general medical hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%