2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01423.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The health beliefs of hospital staff and the reporting of needlestick injury

Abstract: The solution to non-compliance with the duty to report must be a targeted investment in training and education. Relevance to clinical practice. Finding the reasons for compliance and non-compliance with the duty to report needlestick injuries will help in designing educational programmes for hospital staff and in determining a strategy for improving health behaviour.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
30
0
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
30
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…27 In a study in Iran, 49.6% of healthcare workers had needlestick injuries within the last year; 25 whereas in Tel Aviv, 65.9% of the HCPs had needlestick injuries during their past professional experience. 28 In a study in Egypt, 35.6% of the health care personnel was exposed to at least one needlestick injury during the past three months. 29 The universal precautions guidelines are the major way to protect healthcare workers against bloodborne diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 In a study in Iran, 49.6% of healthcare workers had needlestick injuries within the last year; 25 whereas in Tel Aviv, 65.9% of the HCPs had needlestick injuries during their past professional experience. 28 In a study in Egypt, 35.6% of the health care personnel was exposed to at least one needlestick injury during the past three months. 29 The universal precautions guidelines are the major way to protect healthcare workers against bloodborne diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived susceptibility to diseases did not modify reporting rates, although professionals who reported accidents showed higher perceived severity levels of diseases that can be transmitted after exposure to biological material [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As for the professional category, it was evidenced that nurses not only reported their accidents involving biological material more frequently, but also tended to adopt safer work practices and were more likely to follow protocols and guidelines in their clinical practice [10]. Elmiyeh, Whitaker, James, et al [11] and Tabak, Shiaabana and Shasha [12] detected higher underreporting rates among physicians and explained that those professionals could be more inclined to assess their own risk before they decided to report, as they could request serology tests themselves and knew more about the nature of the lesion and the patient's serological condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second possible explanation can be found in the health belief model, a psychological model evaluating behavior using the 3 constructs of threat perception, benefit perception, and perceived disadvantage. 8 Per hospital protocol, HCWs exposed to known HIV or HCV patients received consultation with infectious diseases specialists who perform a review of source patient infectivity, including a review of source patient viral suppressive therapy and viral load (data unavailable to the hospital occupational medicine clinic). It is possible that follow-up compliance may be affected by an HCWs low-perceived susceptibility following delivery of these data during specialist assessment; however, the deidentified data source utilized for this study prevented retrospective record review to explore such a hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%