1991
DOI: 10.1109/49.93089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The HDSL environment (high bit rate digital subscriber line)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to express these parameters in terms of the attenuation coefficient, which is often given in nepers, as well as adopt other reference lengths, like in [16], proper scaling must be performed. In this way, one can use the following relation to scale from dB/100 m to Np/100 m: IL(f ) (dB/100 m) = 8.686 × 100 × α(f ), where α(f ) is the cable's frequency dependent attenuation coefficient (given in nepers per meter) and f is the frequency in MHz [20].…”
Section: B Cable Types and Line Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to express these parameters in terms of the attenuation coefficient, which is often given in nepers, as well as adopt other reference lengths, like in [16], proper scaling must be performed. In this way, one can use the following relation to scale from dB/100 m to Np/100 m: IL(f ) (dB/100 m) = 8.686 × 100 × α(f ), where α(f ) is the cable's frequency dependent attenuation coefficient (given in nepers per meter) and f is the frequency in MHz [20].…”
Section: B Cable Types and Line Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the variability of crosstalk coupling functions, crosstalk is commonly characterized by either stochastic models, which provide distinct realizations of crosstalk channels, or worst-case models. For example, a 1% worst-case FEXT (far-end crosstalk) model predicts that no more than one percent of all FEXT transfer functions in the cable will be more severe than the one derived by the model, as discussed in [19], [31]- [34].…”
Section: G Crosstalk Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise was assumed to have two components: an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) component with a power spectrum density of -114 dBm/Hz and a nearend crosstalk (NEXT) component from 49 pairs. The transfer function for modeling the NEXT was taken as I H N E x T (~)~~ = 10-13f1.5 [12]. Both the TEQ and the target response were assumed to be of order 16.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%