The SR proteins constitute a large family of nuclear phosphoproteins required for constitutive pre-mRNA splicing. These factors also have global, concentration-dependent effects on alternative splicing regulation and this activity is antagonized by members of the hnRNP A/B family of proteins. We show here that whereas some human SR proteins are confined to the nucleus, three of them-SF2/ASF, SRp20, and 9G8-shuttle rapidly and continuously between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. By swapping the corresponding domains between shuttling and nonshuttling SR proteins, we show that the carboxy-terminal arginine/serine-rich (RS) domain is required for shuttling. This domain, however, is not sufficient to promote shuttling of an unrelated protein reporter, suggesting that stable RNA binding mediated by the RNA-recognition motifs may be required for shuttling. Consistent with such a requirement, a double point-mutation in RRM1 of SF2/ASF that impairs RNA binding prevents the protein from shuttling. In addition, we show that phosphorylation of the RS domain affects the shuttling properties of SR proteins. These findings show that different SR proteins have unique intracellular transport properties and suggest that the family members that shuttle may have roles not only in nuclear pre-mRNA splicing but also in mRNA transport, cytoplasmic events, and/or processes that involve communication between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. The SR proteins are closely related, highly conserved RNA-binding proteins that have dual roles in pre-mRNA splicing. They are essential for constitutive splicing and also regulate splicing in a concentration-dependent manner by influencing the selection of alternative splice sites (Ge and Manley 1990; Krainer et al. 1990a,b;Zahler et al. 1993; for review, see Fu 1995; Manley and Tacke 1996; Cá ceres and Krainer 1997). The activity of SR proteins in regulated splicing is antagonized by members of the hnRNP A/B family of proteins (Mayeda and Krainer 1992;Mayeda et al. 1994) and alterations in the ratio of these antagonistic factors cause drastic changes in splice-site selection both in vitro and in vivo (Mayeda and Krainer 1992;Cá ceres et al. 1994;Yang et al. 1994). The relative abundance of each SR protein and the molar ratio of each SR protein to hnRNP A1 or to other antagonists may therefore determine the patterns of alternative splicing of many genes expressed in specific cell types. Tissue-specific variations in the total and relative amounts of SR proteins or mRNAs have been described (for review, see Cá ceres and Krainer 1997) and in addition, the molar ratio of SF2/ASF to hnRNPA1 varies over a wide range in different rat tissues (A. Hanamura, J.F. Cá ceres, A. Mayeda, and A.R. Krainer, in prep.).The SR proteins are nuclear phosphoproteins that are concentrated, together with most other splicing factors, in nuclear subregions termed speckles. The speckle domain seen by immunofluorescence corresponds to interchromatin granule clusters and perichromatin fibrils at the electron microscope level (f...