2016
DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2016.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hazards of rapid approval of new drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Several countries, such as the United States and Canada, have developed a Fast-Track process for drug approval, although not without controversy and increased safety warnings, compared to drugs approved through the usual regulatory process. 28 Yet, "cutting red tape" in Australia has been beneficial for bringing technologies and drugs to patients, 29 and some benefit of Fast-Tracking measures has been documented by the US FDA. 30 During the current pandemic, accelerated regulatory procedures for drug approvals have already been implemented, including the FDA's Emergency Use Authorization for remdesivir.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Several countries, such as the United States and Canada, have developed a Fast-Track process for drug approval, although not without controversy and increased safety warnings, compared to drugs approved through the usual regulatory process. 28 Yet, "cutting red tape" in Australia has been beneficial for bringing technologies and drugs to patients, 29 and some benefit of Fast-Tracking measures has been documented by the US FDA. 30 During the current pandemic, accelerated regulatory procedures for drug approvals have already been implemented, including the FDA's Emergency Use Authorization for remdesivir.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even then, there are several examples of rapidly registered therapeutic goods where product removal was required once the “real world” phase 4 data became available. A recent article suggested that registration approval can be made too early for drugs with limited data or data reliant on biochemical surrogate markers, which can potentially translate into less chance of identifying adverse drug reactions before marketing 4 . We found evidence of at least 35 drugs removed — not including those with reduced indications or black box warnings —after United States Food and Drug Administration registration due to adverse drug events 5 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Similar pathways currently operate in Europe, Canada and the USA. 14 In response to the review, the TGA released two consultation papers in 2017. The first aimed to seek opinions on enhancements to the current Medicines Vigilance Framework in order to better identify and address medicine safety concerns.…”
Section: Pharmacovigilance and Expedited Approvalsmentioning
confidence: 99%