1975
DOI: 10.1159/000144500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The harp seal, <i>Pagophilus groenlandicus</i> (Erxleben, 1777)

Abstract: Three types of fibre, dark (type 1), light (type 2) and intermediate, were distinguished in the caval sphincter muscle of the diaphragm in the harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus) using histochemical and electron-microscopic techniques. The dark fibre contained large peripheral aggregations of mitochondria, numerous lipid droplets and dense aggregates of glycogen granules. The same features were observed in the dark fibre of the diaphragm muscle too. In the light of the low oxidative enzyme activity and high l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on histochemical and biochemical profiles, the major locomotory skeletal muscle of the narwhal, the longissimus dorsi, indicates an animal built for slow, endurance swimming. Mean fiber diameters for slow twitch fibers (62.6 ± 20.0) and fast twitch fibers combined (60.3 ± 16.2) were 19%-162% larger than that reported for the same muscle in harp seals (George and Ronald 1973), but were similar in size to the locomotory muscle (quadriceps) of humans (Dubowitz 1985). Although both fast twitch and slow twitch fibers were identified (Table 2, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Based on histochemical and biochemical profiles, the major locomotory skeletal muscle of the narwhal, the longissimus dorsi, indicates an animal built for slow, endurance swimming. Mean fiber diameters for slow twitch fibers (62.6 ± 20.0) and fast twitch fibers combined (60.3 ± 16.2) were 19%-162% larger than that reported for the same muscle in harp seals (George and Ronald 1973), but were similar in size to the locomotory muscle (quadriceps) of humans (Dubowitz 1985). Although both fast twitch and slow twitch fibers were identified (Table 2, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Our findings suggest a potential pattern in fiber type proportions between the Phocinae and Monachinae subfamilies. Hooded and ribbon seals are now the only Phocinae seals for which comparable fiber type data remain unavailable, but species from this lineage typically have a predominance of fast-twitch fibers in locomotor muscles (George et al, 1971;Reed et al, 1994;Watson et al, 2003). This pattern is opposite to that exhibited by the few Monachinae species that have been measured (i.e., elephant and Weddell seals), which have primarily slow-twitch fibers (Kanatous et al, 2002(Kanatous et al, , 2008Moore et al, 2014).…”
Section: Species Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The locomotor muscles of deep, long-duration divers like elephant (Mirounga angustirostris) and Weddell (Leptonychotes weddellii) seals are almost exclusively composed of slow-twitch fibers and have particularly high myoglobin content ([Mb]) (Kanatous et al, 2002(Kanatous et al, , 2008. In contrast, species with more moderate dive profiles, like generalist harbor seals (Phoca vitulina), have a more even mix of slow-and fast-twitch fibers and have relatively lower [Mb] in locomotor muscles (George et al, 1971;Reed et al, 1994;Watson et al, 2003). Although much is known about the muscle profiles of a few wellstudied pinniped species, there are many seal species for which data are limited or lacking altogether.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral hearing tests have been successfully trained in bottlenose dolphins, (e.g., Tursiops sp. [ 55 ]; killer whales ( Orcinus orca, [ 56 , 57 ]); false killer whales ( Pseudorca crassidens, [ 58 ]); Pacific white-sided dolphins ( Lagenorhynchus obliquidens , [ 59 ]); Tucuxis ( Sotalia fluviatilis , [ 60 ]); harbor porpoises ( Phocoena phocoena, [ 61 ]); California sea lions ( Zalophus californianus, [ 62 , 63 ]); Stellar sea lions ( Eumetopias jubatus , [ 64 , 65 ]); harbor seals ( Phoca vitulina, [ 62 , 63 ]); Harp seals ( Pagophilus groenlandicus, [ 66 ]); spotted seals ( Phoca largha , [ 63 ]); ringed seals ( Pusa hispida , [ 67 ]); bearded seals ( Erignathus barbatus; [ 68 ]); northern elephant seals ( Mirounga angustirostris , [ 62 ]); northern fur seals ( Callorhinus ursinus , [ 69 ]); Hawaiian monk seals ( Neomonachus schauinslandi, [ 70 ]); Pacific walrus ( Odobenus rosmarus divergens , [ 71 ]); belugas ( Delphinapterus leucas , [ 72 ]); Florida manatees ( Trichechus manatus latirostris , [ 73 ]); polar bears ( Ursus maritimus , [ 74 ]); and sea otters ( Enhydra lutris , [ 75 ]). Behavioral hearing tests are the “gold-standard” of tests to determine individual animal sensitivity and range.…”
Section: Behavioral Hearing Tests and Auditory Evoked Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%