2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00214-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The harmonization of cardiac troponin I measurement is independent of sample time collection but is dependent on the source of calibrator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At the analytical level, various antibodies used in the measurement systems recognize different epitopes with varying avidity and crossreactivity. The search should continue for a reference material; however, identification of a common calibrating material suitable for standardization of all cTnI methods will be challenging because specimen-dependent variations in cTnI values were found for measurements performed on different cTnI systems that could not be accounted for by calibration differences or by time of specimen collection (22,23 ). Although identifying a common calibrating material is important, the primary clinical concern is harmonization of results, i.e., consistency and reliability for interpretation of patient measurements and clinical trial results (24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the analytical level, various antibodies used in the measurement systems recognize different epitopes with varying avidity and crossreactivity. The search should continue for a reference material; however, identification of a common calibrating material suitable for standardization of all cTnI methods will be challenging because specimen-dependent variations in cTnI values were found for measurements performed on different cTnI systems that could not be accounted for by calibration differences or by time of specimen collection (22,23 ). Although identifying a common calibrating material is important, the primary clinical concern is harmonization of results, i.e., consistency and reliability for interpretation of patient measurements and clinical trial results (24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteolysis of cTnI has been shown to lead to detection difficulties when antibodies against proteolytically cleaved regions are used (8 -10 ). Variations in cTnI assay results are also partly attributable to different calibrators that most likely differ from the actual analyte (11 ). This leads to what is probably the most important source of assay discrepancies: the analyte itself.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have reported a sample-dependent variation that does occur for cTnI measurement probably reflecting differences in cTnI isoforms for some samples and different assay reactivity [12,24]. Using cTnI assays available in the late 1990s Wu et al showed that while assays recognized both the complexed and free cTnI forms, some did not give equal relative responses to the various forms of cTnI, hence resulting in over-or under-estimation of the cTnI concentration in patient samples [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, for which a commutable CRM is available, has been applied to the standardization of various proteins, including quite recently cystatin C [10]. Several studies have shown that serum-based cTnI-positive materials could be used in assay calibration to reduce the difference in cTnI results between routine assays [6,11,12]. In the AACC study, result equivalence was observed after the mathematical realignment of values against the median cTnI concentrations of six pools, the variability of results among cTnI assays decreasing from CVs of approximately 90% to CVs of 7%-28% [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%