The Hare and the Tortoise Revisited: The New Politics of Consumer and Environmental Regulation in Europe

Abstract

There has been an important shift in the pattern of divergence between consumer and environmental protection policies in Europe and the United States. From the 1960s through the mid 1980s American regulatory standards tended to be more stringent, comprehensive and innovative than in either individual European countries or in the European Union (EU). However, since around 1990 the obverse has been true; many important EU consumer and environmental regulations are now more precautionary than their American counterparts.The ‘new’ politics of consumer and environmental regulation in Europe are attributable to three inter-related factors: a series of regulatory failures within Europe, broader and stronger political support for more stringent and comprehensive regulatory standards within Europe and the growth in the regulatory competence of the European Union.In many respects, European regulatory politics and policies since the 1990s resemble those of the United States during the 1970s. Thus health, safety and environmental politics and policies in the United States are no longer as distinctive as many scholars have portrayed them.

The allure of technology: How France and California promoted electric and hybrid vehicles to reduce urban air pollution

“…Indeed, recently Vogel argued that, since the late 1980s, the US and Europe have "traded places." 61 In other words, whereas in the 1970s and 1980s, the US provided strong leadership in environmental policy by adopting strict and innovative legislation, over the last 15 years, European countries have taken the lead (Vogel, 2003). Our study demonstrates that the French and the California experiences with EV policies are exceptions to this trend reversal.…”

“…There is a tradition of cross-national studies which over the last 25 years has tried to make sense of the variety of environmental, risk and consumer regulations adopted in various industrialized nations (Ashford et al, 1982;Brickman et al, 1985;Badaracco, 1985;Kelman, 1980;Lundqvist, 1980;Vogel, 1986Vogel, ,2003Wilson, 1985). The specific subject of these comparative studies ranges from air and water quality control to chemicals regulation and occupational health hazards.…”

Deliberative democracy meets democratised science: a deliberative systems approach to global environmental governance

“…2001, Vogel 2003. These proposals primarily aim to strengthen the legitimation of decisions and the robustness of regulations.…”

Enabling the Contextualization of Legal Rules in Responsive Strategies to Climate Change

“…Why is it so difficult to abstract from direct involvement in purposive action? How do we explain the rise of a new generation of specific regulation, even in an epoch of liberalism (Majone 1994, Vogel 2003? Why does legislation not focus on the permanent and the general but rather on the particular and the temporary (Hayek 1973)?…”