2022
DOI: 10.23941/ejpe.v15i1.658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“The Hardest of All the Problems”

Abstract: This paper provides a history of the development of Harold Hochman and James Rodgers’ (1969) theory of Pareto optimal redistribution, which modeled income transfers as a public good. Pareto optimal redistribution provided an economic efficiency case for redistribution policy. After reviewing the emergence of Pareto optimal redistribution at the University of Virginia and its elaboration at the Urban Institute in the early 1970s, the paper describes James M. Buchanan’s efforts to grapple with his colleague’s id… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This methodological stance, coupled with an epistemological approach of abstract mathematical deduction, reflects key aspects of current economic orthodoxy [1,2,25]. Value judgments are excluded, and interpersonal comparisons of utility are reduced to the Pareto principle, which hampers debates about (global) social justice, since material improvements for one person are only recognized as such if no other person is made worse off [26,27]. In times of excessive resource depletion, material overconsumption, and unsustainable affluence in high-income countries, utility comparisons based on Paretian welfare economics limit the scope of social-ecological policy debates to address poverty or income and wealth inequities.…”
Section: The Neoliberal and Positivist Foundations Of Economics Educa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodological stance, coupled with an epistemological approach of abstract mathematical deduction, reflects key aspects of current economic orthodoxy [1,2,25]. Value judgments are excluded, and interpersonal comparisons of utility are reduced to the Pareto principle, which hampers debates about (global) social justice, since material improvements for one person are only recognized as such if no other person is made worse off [26,27]. In times of excessive resource depletion, material overconsumption, and unsustainable affluence in high-income countries, utility comparisons based on Paretian welfare economics limit the scope of social-ecological policy debates to address poverty or income and wealth inequities.…”
Section: The Neoliberal and Positivist Foundations Of Economics Educa...mentioning
confidence: 99%