Conceptual Density Functional Theory 2022
DOI: 10.1002/9783527829941.ch14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hard/Soft Acid/Base Rule: A Perspective from Conceptual Density‐Functional Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 125 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While powerful and hugely influential, this model can be seen as the simplest representation of electron transfer during a chemical reaction. This simplicity has often been (rightfully) argued as one of its key advantages, but this also means that elementary proofs of the HSAB (Pearson, 1968a;Chattaraj et al, 1991), minimum electrophilicity, maximum hardness, and DMB principles usually ignore electrostatic and polarization effects, and do not include charge transfer effects beyond second order (Chattaraj et al, 1991;Parr and Chattaraj, 1991;Ayers and Parr, 2000;Ayers, 2005;Chattaraj and Ayers, 2005;Ayers and Cardenas, 2013;Miranda-Quintana et al, 2018;Ayers et al, 2022). Recently, some of these approximations have been relaxed (Alain Miranda-Quintana et al, 2016;Miranda-Quintana and Ayers, 2016a;Miranda-Quintana R. A., 2017;Miranda-Quintana et al, 2021;Miranda-Quintana et al, 2022a), which strengthens the support for these principles, but the more realistic tworeagent picture remains largely unexplored Ayers, 2007;Chattaraj et al, 2007;Miranda-Quintana R. A. et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While powerful and hugely influential, this model can be seen as the simplest representation of electron transfer during a chemical reaction. This simplicity has often been (rightfully) argued as one of its key advantages, but this also means that elementary proofs of the HSAB (Pearson, 1968a;Chattaraj et al, 1991), minimum electrophilicity, maximum hardness, and DMB principles usually ignore electrostatic and polarization effects, and do not include charge transfer effects beyond second order (Chattaraj et al, 1991;Parr and Chattaraj, 1991;Ayers and Parr, 2000;Ayers, 2005;Chattaraj and Ayers, 2005;Ayers and Cardenas, 2013;Miranda-Quintana et al, 2018;Ayers et al, 2022). Recently, some of these approximations have been relaxed (Alain Miranda-Quintana et al, 2016;Miranda-Quintana and Ayers, 2016a;Miranda-Quintana R. A., 2017;Miranda-Quintana et al, 2021;Miranda-Quintana et al, 2022a), which strengthens the support for these principles, but the more realistic tworeagent picture remains largely unexplored Ayers, 2007;Chattaraj et al, 2007;Miranda-Quintana R. A. et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%