The “handedness” of language: Directional symmetry breaking of sign usage in words

Abstract

Language, which allows complex ideas to be communicated through symbolic sequences, is a characteristic feature of our species and manifested in a multitude of forms. Using large written corpora for many different languages and scripts, we show that the occurrence probability distributions of signs at the left and right ends of words have a distinct heterogeneous nature. Characterizing this asymmetry using quantitative inequality measures, viz. information entropy and the Gini index, we show that the beginning of a word is less restrictive in sign usage than the end. This property is not simply attributable to the use of common affixes as it is seen even when only word roots are considered. We use the existence of this asymmetry to infer the direction of writing in undeciphered inscriptions that agrees with the archaeological evidence. Unlike traditional investigations of phonotactic constraints which focus on language-specific patterns, our study reveals a property valid across languages and writing systems. As both language and writing are unique aspects of our species, this universal signature may reflect an innate feature of the human cognitive phenomenon.

Evaluating Signalization and Channelization Selections at Intersections Based on an Entropy Method

“…Lane 2 is the ELTL for flows to decelerate and accelerate. All lengths are based on AASHTO ‘Highway Capacity Manual’ [ 59 ], ‘A policy on geometric design of highways and streets’ [ 60 ], and on previous studies [ 61 , 62 ]. All parameters are described in Table 2 .…”

Evaluating the sustainable traffic flow operational features of an exclusive spur dike U-turn lane design

“…Lane 2 and lane 3 are the components of ESUL for flow i = 4. All lengths are based on AASHTO ‘Highway Capacity Manual’ [37] and ‘A policy on geometric design of highways and streets’ [38] and on previous studies [39, 40]. Section AB is based on a road alignment process, section BC is calculated by drivers’ reaction times and movement procedures, section CD is the diversion part, section DE includes deceleration and safety distance, and section EF is made for vehicles to have enough space to perform a U-turn, accelerate, seek a headway gap and perform merge movement contained in sections FH and HI .…”