2022
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9d98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Halo Bias inside Cosmic Voids

Abstract: The bias of dark matter halos and galaxies is a crucial quantity in many cosmological analyses. In this work, using large cosmological simulations, we explore the halo mass function and halo bias within cosmic voids. For the first time to date, we show that they are scale dependent along the void profile, and provide a predictive theoretical model of both the halo mass function and halo bias inside voids, recovering for the latter a 1% accuracy against simulated data. These findings may help shed light on the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the different characteristics of the PATCHY catalogs leading to an overall increase in the precision on the cosmological parameters with respect to the BOSS data, we note that part of the constraining power is absorbed by the Vdn model nuisance parameters C slope and C offset , when not kept fixed to their best-fit values. This shows how a rigorous calibration of these parameters is fundamental to maximize the effectiveness of the void size function as a cosmological probe (Contarini et al 2021;Verza et al 2022).…”
Section: Appendix B Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the different characteristics of the PATCHY catalogs leading to an overall increase in the precision on the cosmological parameters with respect to the BOSS data, we note that part of the constraining power is absorbed by the Vdn model nuisance parameters C slope and C offset , when not kept fixed to their best-fit values. This shows how a rigorous calibration of these parameters is fundamental to maximize the effectiveness of the void size function as a cosmological probe (Contarini et al 2021;Verza et al 2022).…”
Section: Appendix B Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case corresponds to the ideal assumption of using volume-unlimited cosmological simulations perfectly reproducing the survey data that one wants to study or, alternatively, to have a size function model including a fully theoretical description of both the effects of redshift-space distortions and mass tracer bias. This approach has been explored from a theoretical point of view in recent works (e.g., Verza et al 2022), but a complete and calibration-independent model has not yet been provided. Although optimistic, this first approach shows the full potential of the methodology and is useful to understand the limitations related to the calibration procedure; the analysis performed with fixed values of C slope and C offset will be labeled hereafter as fixed calibration.…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analysis, we have used the "Dark Energy and Massive Neutrino Universe" (DEMNUni) suite of large N-body simulations [12]. The DEMNUni simulations have been produced with the aim of investigating the large-scale structure of the Universe in the presence of massive neutrinos and dynamical DE, and they were conceived for the nonlinear analysis and modelling of different probes, including dark matter, halo, and galaxy clustering [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], CMB lensing, Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and integrated Sachs-Wolfe effects [12,22,23], cosmic void statistics [24][25][26][27], as well as cross-correlations among these probes [28,29].…”
Section: Deflection Angle Distribution Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally developed for testing different probes in the presence of massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy, the Dark Energy and Massive Neutrino Universe (DEMNUni) (Carbone et al 2016) experiment is a suite of N-Body simulations (Roncarelli et al 2015;Castorina et al 2015;Moresco et al 2017;Fabbian et al 2018;Ruggeri et al 2018;Kreisch et al 2019;Schuster et al 2019;Verza et al 2019;Parimbelli et al 2021aParimbelli et al , 2022bVerza et al 2022b;Guidi et al 2022;Verza et al 2022a;Hernández-Molinero et al 2023) in ΛCDM, plus different νw 0 w a CDM cosmological scenarios. The largest simulations follow the evolution of 2048 3 CDM and (if present) 2048 3 neutrino particles, in a box of side L = 2 Gpc/h.…”
Section: Demnuni_cov N-body Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%