1992
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530250070018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The H-reflex to Magnetic Stimulation of Lower-Limb Nerves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 The sensory fiber and motor nerve fiber conduction velocity in the S1 nerve root within the spinal canal Length of S1 nerve root (cm) 17.5 a (SD = 0. reflexes to tibial nerve stimulation lengthened out-of-proportion to the M wave changes during the ischemia. These findings complement earlier studies of the possible clinical feasibility of S1 nerve root stimulation for H-reflexes using magnetic (Zhu et al, 1992;Maccabee et al, 1996) and electrical stimulation (Ertekin et al, 1996). The application of S1 nerve root stimulation methods for eliciting H-reflexes provides a method for distinguishing between proximal and distal lesion sites of the S1 nerve root and its peripheral pathway subserving soleus H-reflexes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 3 The sensory fiber and motor nerve fiber conduction velocity in the S1 nerve root within the spinal canal Length of S1 nerve root (cm) 17.5 a (SD = 0. reflexes to tibial nerve stimulation lengthened out-of-proportion to the M wave changes during the ischemia. These findings complement earlier studies of the possible clinical feasibility of S1 nerve root stimulation for H-reflexes using magnetic (Zhu et al, 1992;Maccabee et al, 1996) and electrical stimulation (Ertekin et al, 1996). The application of S1 nerve root stimulation methods for eliciting H-reflexes provides a method for distinguishing between proximal and distal lesion sites of the S1 nerve root and its peripheral pathway subserving soleus H-reflexes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The mean H-M interval was 6.8 ms which includes one ms for monosynaptic activation of the motor neurons, leaving 5.8 ms as the travel time in the dorsal and ventral sacral roots. Our earlier data (Zhu et al, 1992) suggested that the conduction velocity of the Ia afferents was approximately 18% faster than motor efferents in the proximal segment of the sciatic nerve, giving the travel time of 2.6 ms and a motor efferent travel time of 3.2 ms. The travel time in each of the roots divided by the length of the root (8.75 cm) gives a Ia afferents conduction velocity of 67.3 m/s and a motor efferents conduction velocity of 54.7 ms (Table 3).…”
Section: Anatomical Studies Of S1 Nerve Rootmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barker et al, 1987;Chokroverty et al, 1993;Evans et al, 1988;Polkey et al, 1996;Vivodtzev et al, 2005;Zhu et al, 1992) and in the diagnosis of neurological abnormality (Benecke, 1996;Murray, 1991). Magnetic stimulation of a peripheral motor nerve activates the fast motor units (Maertens de Noordhout, 1991) and has become popular as a painless alternative to electrical stimulation for assessing true maximal neuromuscular performance (Gleeson, 2001;Hopkins and Ingersoll, 2000;Zhou et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu et al reported that the soleus H‐reflex can be elicited by magnetic or high‐voltage electrical stimulation of the S1 nerve root at the S1 foramen. The peak interval between H‐ and M‐waves (HMI, H‐M interval) represents the intraspinal conduction time of the reflex which could differentiate proximal nerve or root lesions from distal lesions . Jin et al demonstrated that the S1 H‐reflex was more sensitive than the tibial H‐reflex for detecting S1 nerve root lesions .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%