2012
DOI: 10.1186/2043-9113-2-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The H-factor as a novel quality metric for homology modeling

Abstract: BackgroundDrug discovery typically starts with the identification of a potential target that is then tested and validated either through high-throughput screening against a library of drug compounds or by rational drug design. When the putative target is a protein, the latter approach requires the knowledge of its structure. Finding the structure of a protein is however a difficult task. Significant progress has come from high-resolution techniques such as X-ray crystallography and NMR; there are many proteins… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Loops were optimized using the MODELLER automatic loop refinement method. Before being used for the following molecular simulation steps, the quality of our 3D0 homology model was evaluated using the PROCHECK [ 43 ], H-factor [ 44 ], and ProSA-web [ 45 ] programs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loops were optimized using the MODELLER automatic loop refinement method. Before being used for the following molecular simulation steps, the quality of our 3D0 homology model was evaluated using the PROCHECK [ 43 ], H-factor [ 44 ], and ProSA-web [ 45 ] programs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality and accuracy of the set of models were assessed by the H-factor, a novel quality metric for homology modelling we recently introduced. 38 , 39 Due to the high sequence conservation of the SET domain between NSD1 and NSD2, the modelling of NSD2-SET represents an ideal case.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general rule of thumb is selecting the protein template with the highest sequence identity with the receptor of interest, particularly on the target pocket, and sequence identities lower than 30% will produce significantly less reliable models (Fiser, 2010). The quality of homology models must be assessed before using them in a receptor-based VS, and while there are many ways of evaluating the quality of a homology model (Bhattacharya et al ., 2008; DasGupta et al ., 2015; di Luccio and Koehl, 2012; Eramian et al ., 2006; Shen and Sali, 2006), and most of the modelling tools include scores for quality assessment, it is important to know their capabilities and limits. Many assessment tools are biased towards the more known structures and may fail with proteins less represented in the databases, as is the case for membrane proteins (Benkert et al ., 2011; di Luccio and Koehl, 2012).…”
Section: An Overview Of the Computational/virtual Screening Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%