2001
DOI: 10.1080/01446190110049848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The guaranteed maximum price contract as call option

Abstract: Due to increasing constraints on project duration and costs, together with the increasing implication of contractors in the design process, guaranteed maximum price (GMP) contracts are likely to become common in the future. This paper explores a new approach for evaluating the remuneration of the contractor. The GMP contract is considered as a hybrid arrangement consisting of a cost reimbursement contract and a call option on a fixed price contract. The option pricing theory is used as a conceptual framework t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the client exercises a more stringent control against overspending under this special arrangement. In addition, the gain-share/pain-share mechanism under the GMP/TCC arrangement offers strong financial incentives for the contractor to become more efficient and to achieve cost saving (Perry and Barnes, 2000;Boukendour and Bah, 2001;Fan and Greenwood, 2004). Conducive to improving partners' working relationship via partnering 3…”
Section: Enhanced Cost Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, the client exercises a more stringent control against overspending under this special arrangement. In addition, the gain-share/pain-share mechanism under the GMP/TCC arrangement offers strong financial incentives for the contractor to become more efficient and to achieve cost saving (Perry and Barnes, 2000;Boukendour and Bah, 2001;Fan and Greenwood, 2004). Conducive to improving partners' working relationship via partnering 3…”
Section: Enhanced Cost Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perry and Barnes, 2000;Broome and Perry, 2002). Boukendour and Bah (2001) considered GMP to be a hybrid arrangement consisting of a cost imbursement contract and a call option for a fixed price contract. The contractor guarantees that the project will be completed within the contract period in full accordance with the drawings and specifications and the cost to the owner will not exceed the initial GMP at main contract award.…”
Section: Target Cost Contracting (Tcc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Broome and Perry (2002) and Badenfelt (2008) explored how the gain-share/pain-share ratio in TCC should be determined in the British and Swedish perspectives respectively. Boukendour and Bah (2001) analysed GMP with option pricing theory and considered GMP as a hybrid of cost reimbursement contract and optional contract which hedge the owner from over-budget and provide him possibility of cost savings. Bower et al (2002) examined three projects with different contractual arrangements, including one with TCC, to illustrate the effective use of incentive mechanisms.…”
Section: Rationale Behind Using Tccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gain-share/pain-share mechanism of the GMP/TCC approach generated an enormous impetus for contractor to innovate, save cost and solve problems as highlighted by Boukendour and Bah (2001). In particular, the contractor interviewee (Contractor 1) stressed that early participation of the contractor could not only enhance the buildability by integrating the design and construction, but also allow advanced programme planning for faster construction.…”
Section: Perceived Benefits Of Gmp/tccmentioning
confidence: 99%