2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-016-0093-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The growth trend in learning strategies during the transition from secondary to higher education in Flanders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
13
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…As the data were gathered at unequal time intervals, unequal time scores were used to estimate the model. For the free time scores model, the two middle scores were freely estimated (Coertjens, Donche, De Maeyer, van Daal, & Van Petegem, 2017). To examine which model fitted the data best, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were used as well as a model comparison based on the chi-square test with Satorra-Bentler scaling (Muth en & Muth en, 2015;Satorra & Bentler, 2010).…”
Section: Preliminary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the data were gathered at unequal time intervals, unequal time scores were used to estimate the model. For the free time scores model, the two middle scores were freely estimated (Coertjens, Donche, De Maeyer, van Daal, & Van Petegem, 2017). To examine which model fitted the data best, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were used as well as a model comparison based on the chi-square test with Satorra-Bentler scaling (Muth en & Muth en, 2015;Satorra & Bentler, 2010).…”
Section: Preliminary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research to this point has been unclear about learning strategy changes during this crucial period. Longitudinal research has often indicated either small improvement over tertiary entry level but little development in the transition to (Coertjens, Donche, De Maeyer, van Daal, & Van Petegem, 2017) and during tertiary experiences (i.e., Coertjens, Donche, De Maeyer, Vanthournout, & Van Petegem, 2013). Early research utilizing difference testing over time generally suggested a decline in the quality of student learning (e.g., Volet, Renshaw, & Tietzel, 1994;Watkins & Hattie, 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gauge whether or not students increase their deep learning to the detriment of surface and unregulated learning, studies on learning strategies have relied upon latent growth analysis [ 55 ]. We use this technique here as well, given that it allows the estimation of MNAR models more easily than does multilevel analysis [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%