1946
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.22.3-4.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Growth of Brown Trout (Salmo Trutta Linn.)

Abstract: 1. Groups of trout fry of the same parentage were grown in environments where the following factors were controlled: temperature, amount and intensity of illumination, rate of water flow, aeration and chemical composition of the water, amount of living space and quality of food supply. They were allowed to eat as much as they would, and individual weights were recorded during the first 8 months after the beginning of feeding. 2. There was soon an increase in the range of individual weight in eac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CF value is often used in length‐weight relationships to assess the effects of conditions such as environment, food supply and infection degree. In addition, the seasonal change in fish is determined by the combination of condition factors (Brown, 1946). In the present study, the CF value was used to investigate environmental impacts in relation to the gonad cycles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CF value is often used in length‐weight relationships to assess the effects of conditions such as environment, food supply and infection degree. In addition, the seasonal change in fish is determined by the combination of condition factors (Brown, 1946). In the present study, the CF value was used to investigate environmental impacts in relation to the gonad cycles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fishes with size hierarchies, growth regulation of subordinates typically occurs via the use of aggression by the dominants (Brown, 1946;Koebele, 1985;Allen, 1972;Ochi, 1986;Hattori, 1991;Booth, 1995) or interception of food resources (Magnusson, 1962;Coates, 1980;Forrester, 1991). In J. transcriptus pairs, the dominance index of larger individuals in pairs was usually higher than that of their partner, indicating that larger individuals were dominant in both pair types.…”
Section: Proximate Causes Of Growth Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, grading effectively decreased the variation in size and increased the mean size of hatchery Yellow Perch Perca flavescens (Wallat et al. ), and it also increased the growth of hatchery Brown Trout Salmo trutta (Brown ) and Atlantic Salmon S. salar (Gunnes ). However, other studies have found grading to have no growth benefit for Arctic Char Salvelinus alpinus (Wallace and Kolbeinshavn ) or for Brown Trout, Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis , and Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Pyle ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size grading is one method that could be used to select for larger fish from a given rearing unit. Literature on fish grading and its effect on hatchery rearing date back to the mid‐1900s (e.g., Brown ; Mullan ; Pyle ), and grading practices continue to be used as a tool for rearing hatchery trout by some state agencies (Mark Clifford, State of California Department of Fish and Game, personal communication; Kris Urquhart, Nevada Division of Wildlife, personal communication). Hatcheries grade fish to achieve a uniform size, to reduce cannibalism in certain species, and to increase the accuracy of weight estimates by reducing size variation during sample counts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%