2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.11.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The growth of benzophenone crystals by Sankaranarayanan–Ramasamy (SR) method and slow evaporation solution technique (SEST): A comparative investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KDP, TGS, ADP, and benzophenone crystal plates of 2 mm thickness were cut and polished from various parts of the crystals along (101), (001), (101), and (101) plane, respectively, and used for optical measurements without any antireflection coating. It is very well evident from Figure a–d that all the grown crystals have good transparency in the visible region which is better than the reported values found in the literature . Table shows the comparison of the transparency of the grown crystals with other methods including the present setup.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 39%
“…KDP, TGS, ADP, and benzophenone crystal plates of 2 mm thickness were cut and polished from various parts of the crystals along (101), (001), (101), and (101) plane, respectively, and used for optical measurements without any antireflection coating. It is very well evident from Figure a–d that all the grown crystals have good transparency in the visible region which is better than the reported values found in the literature . Table shows the comparison of the transparency of the grown crystals with other methods including the present setup.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 39%
“…From the device point of view, the main factors like being free from scattering centers and being without light absorption at the fundamental region are to be possessed in the NLO crystal . Moreover, if the density of the defect increases, the possibility for the occurrence of the scattering center also increases, which significantly leads to the optical loss in the grown crystals . From this point of view, it can be inferred that the higher density defects lead to the higher scattering centers into the conventional method grown crystal and this consequently reduces the optical transparency as shown in open and closed aperture Z -scan spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Moreover, if the density of the defect increases, the possibility for the occurrence of the scattering center also increases, which significantly leads to the optical loss in the grown crystals. 71 From this point of view, it can be inferred that the higher density defects lead to the higher scattering centers into the conventional method grown crystal and this consequently reduces the optical transparency as shown in open and closed aperture Z-scan spectra. In the case of the modified SR method grown crystal, the normalized transmittance appears to be higher compared to the conventional SEST grown crystals due to the superior quality.…”
Section: Table 3 Ftir and Ft-raman Assignments For 2a5npdp Crystalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystalline imperfections influence the optical properties, for example light absorption, scattering, refractive index [11], and for practical devices, crystals free from light scattering and absorbing defects are required. It has been previously reported that as density of defect increases, the possibility for the existence of the scattering centers also increases and this is accountable for the optical loss into the crystals [12]. So it can be deduced that higher dislocation density may lead to generation of the scattering centers into the conventionally grown GCC crystals, which accordingly decreases the optical transparency.…”
Section: Uv-vis Nir Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 98%