2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10588-021-09346-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ground Truth program: simulations as test beds for social science research methods

Abstract: Social systems are uniquely complex and difficult to study, but understanding them is vital to solving the world’s problems. The Ground Truth program developed a new way of testing the research methods that attempt to understand and leverage the Human Domain and its associated complexities. The program developed simulations of social systems as virtual world test beds. Not only were these simulations able to produce data on future states of the system under various circumstances and scenarios, but their causal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using analytical‐thinking techniques (Baghaei Lakeh and Ghaffarzadegan, 2015, 2016; Brauch and Größler, 2022), simulation models (e.g. Naugle et al ., 2022) and “think‐aloud” methods have the potential of helping elicit mental models. We should also explore the potential of multidimensional measures (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using analytical‐thinking techniques (Baghaei Lakeh and Ghaffarzadegan, 2015, 2016; Brauch and Größler, 2022), simulation models (e.g. Naugle et al ., 2022) and “think‐aloud” methods have the potential of helping elicit mental models. We should also explore the potential of multidimensional measures (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System dynamics modeling may also contribute to novel AI capabilities. For example, simulations can be used as testbeds for training AI and studying its utility (Lakkaraju et al, 2022;Naugle et al, 2022b). Some early efforts have been made to use AI for automated causal model generation (Rackauckas et al, 2020;Schoenberg, 2019).…”
Section: Data Science and Aimentioning
confidence: 99%