The GRN concept as a guide for evolutionary developmental biology

Abstract

Organismal phenotypes result largely from inherited developmental programs, usually executed during embryonic and juvenile life stages. These programs are not blank slates onto which natural selection can draw arbitrary forms. Rather, the mechanisms of development play an integral role in shaping phenotypic diversity and help determine the evolutionary trajectories of species. Modern evolutionary biology must, therefore, account for these mechanisms in both theory and in practice. The gene regulatory network (GRN) concept represents a potent tool for achieving this goal whose utility has grown in tandem with advances in “omic” technologies and experimental techniques. However, while the GRN concept is widely utilized, it is often less clear what practical implications it has for conducting research in evolutionary developmental biology. In this Perspective, we attempt to provide clarity by discussing how experiments and projects can be designed in light of the GRN concept. We first map familiar biological notions onto the more abstract components of GRN models. We then review how diverse functional genomic approaches can be directed toward the goal of constructing such models and discuss current methods for functionally testing evolutionary hypotheses that arise from them. Finally, we show how the major steps of GRN model construction and experimental validation suggest generalizable workflows that can serve as a scaffold for project design. Taken together, the practical implications that we draw from the GRN concept provide a set of guideposts for studies aiming at unraveling the molecular basis of phenotypic diversity.

Mechanisms Underlying the Formation and Evolution of Vertebrate Color Patterns

“…Because of their unparalleled diversity, visual accessibility, and widespread occurrence among species, color patterns have the potential of revealing critical insights into the mechanisms underlying biological organization. Recent advances in genomics and experimental approaches (12,40), as well as the relative ease with which they can now be employed in wild-derived species (but also in domestic animals that have been artificially selected for color phenotypes), now offer the possibility of gaining mechanistic insights into the processes underlying the astonishing diversity of color patterns found in nature (Figure 1).…”

Promises and limits of an agency perspective in evolutionary developmental biology

“…For example, gene regulatory networks (GRNs) and their evolution are commonly described as driving or enabling phenotype expression and modification, suggesting an active and enabling role in organismal innovation and diversification (Feigin et al, 2022; Verd et al, 2019). Yet, their relevance in developmental evolution notwithstanding, gene regulatory networks are first and foremost abstractions of interactions taking place across a variety of levels of biological organization, from regulatory elements residing on chromosomes to the transcription factors binding them, from posttranslational modifications of protein products to protein–protein interactions, etc.…”

Beyond Nature Versus Nurture: the Emergence of Emotion

“…Adaptive traits primarily manifest as the organism interacts with, and develops within, its environment (Feigin et al, 2022;Gomez-Marin & Ghazanfar, 2019). As an analogy, consider bipedal walking.…”

“…We see the future of affective science as one that has caught up to modern biology by no longer considering evolution and development, or, as some would have it, adaptive specificity and mechanistic degeneracy (Edelman and Gally, 2001), as competing explanations (Bergman & Beehner, 2022). From here, we propose that at the level of goaldirected behavior, emotions are relatively universal, discrete, and adaptive-one might say evolved-but also necessarily constructed through the body's interaction with the environment.Adaptive traits primarily manifest as the organism interacts with, and develops within, its environment (Feigin et al, 2022;Gomez-Marin & Ghazanfar, 2019). As an analogy, consider bipedal walking.…”