The green side of social innovation: Using sustainable development goals to classify environmental impacts of rural grassroots initiatives

Abstract

Social innovations are grassroots processes aiming to achieve impacts beyond an individual level and towards a broader societal good. The environmental dimension of impacts refers to any direct change to the environment resulting from social innovation activities, products, or services, which are not addressed by preexisting systems. In this paper, we determine the role of social innovation in addressing environmental impacts by analyzing a database of social innovation examples in European and circum-Mediterranean rural areas, compiled within the H2020 Project SIMRA. We conceptualize the overall aim of environmentallyfocused social innovation initiatives as furthering the sustainable development of their territories. To address the environmental impacts of initiatives in a structured way, we use the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) classification, to describe social innovation environmental impacts in relation to specific targets.We analyzed 238 initiatives from the SIMRA catalog and associated initiative websites to identify and classify their direct environmental impacts. Our results indicate that 68% of the cases have at least one direct environmental impact that aligns with a SDG target. The most common impacts are related to sustainable natural resource management (SDGs target 12.2), sustainable food production systems (2.4), and equal access to land (2.3). This SDG-based classification proved to be a useful analytical tool for categorizing internationally policy-relevant environmental impacts of social innovations.

The Influence of Green Infrastructure and Community Participation on Sustainable Natural Resource Management in Indonesia

“…Investing in green infrastructure has several advantages, including improving food security, carbon sequestration, and tourism income in addition to lessening the effects of climate change-related calamities like landslides and floods. Additionally, by enhancing air quality, lowering urban heat island effects, and creating recreational possibilities, green infrastructure initiatives can have a positive co-benefit on human health and well-being [13]- [16].…”

Addressing Poverty through Social Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis

“…Both Spain and the United States have the same number of articles (41), and their high MCP ratio demonstrates their strong commitment to global research networks. Social innovation, entrepreneurship, and education in diverse contexts, including rural and industrial development, environmental sustainability, and business performance, were also their principal research interests (Govigli et al 2022;Puente et al 2021). Collaborative research and affiliations exist between both nations and the majority of European countries, including Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, and others.…”

How Is the Forest Sector’s Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Being Addressed? A Systematic Review of the Methods

“…Impact analysis was likewise used in the selected studies as a method. Marini Govigli et al (2022) used the environment impact tripartite method to understand the green side of social innovation by using the SDGs to classify the environmental impacts of rural grassroots initiatives [98]. Other previously mentioned studies also used impact analysis [94], program impacts [69], and impact scores [40] as methods in their research regarding the contribution of the forest sector to the SDGs.…”