2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The great subjective back-referral debate: Do neural responses increase during a train of stimuli?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an interesting fact in this connection that the direct retinal projection to the colliculus and the very indirect one via lateral geniculate, visual cortex, and thence to colliculus are roughly matched in their collicular "arrival time" (Berson 1988;Waleszczyk et al 1999). In terms of the approach more generally, I would hesitate, however, to rely directly on the more extreme of the time estimates provided by Libet (see Libet et al 1979), on account of the problems encumbering their interpretation (Pockett 2006, provides an entry to this issue).…”
Section: R7 Other Specific Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an interesting fact in this connection that the direct retinal projection to the colliculus and the very indirect one via lateral geniculate, visual cortex, and thence to colliculus are roughly matched in their collicular "arrival time" (Berson 1988;Waleszczyk et al 1999). In terms of the approach more generally, I would hesitate, however, to rely directly on the more extreme of the time estimates provided by Libet (see Libet et al 1979), on account of the problems encumbering their interpretation (Pockett 2006, provides an entry to this issue).…”
Section: R7 Other Specific Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%