S ince the early 2000s, there have been calls for Great Lakes scientists to bridge science and policy communities as communication between scientists and policy makers can be an effective way to address any disconnect, especially for complex environmental problems (Rittell and Webber 1973; Innvaer et al. 2002; Krantzberg 2004; Dreelin and Rose 2008). In Michigan, nearly half of a statewide water policy fellows group, composed of representatives from academia, local governments, state agencies, environmental groups, industry, agriculture, and business, identified that not enough science is currently being used in water policy decisions (Dreelin and Rose 2008). Regionally, community engagement within policy implementation arenas is identified as critical to achieving a prosperous Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin (Krantzberg et al. 2015). Graduate students play an important role in cutting edge research; however, the graduate education in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields generally follows an apprenticeship model where graduate students learn from an established researcher (Vergara et al. 2014). Even though students are prepared to conduct independent research, the challenge is in developing skills and facilitating experiences that will help graduate students see how their research addresses