2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2135447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Great Happiness Moderation

Abstract: This paper shows that within-country happiness inequality has fallen in the majority of countries that have experienced positive income growth over the last forty years, in particular in developed countries. This new stylized fact comes as an addition to the Easterlin paradox, which states that the time trend in average happiness is flat during episodes of long-run income growth. This mean-preserving declining spread in happiness comes about via falls in both the share of individuals who declare low and high l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clark et al . () then looked at this issue systematically, using a wide variety of different datasets and a long time period (1970–2010). The crux of their argument is that countries with growing GDP per capita have also experienced falling happiness inequality.…”
Section: Income Growth and Happiness Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clark et al . () then looked at this issue systematically, using a wide variety of different datasets and a long time period (1970–2010). The crux of their argument is that countries with growing GDP per capita have also experienced falling happiness inequality.…”
Section: Income Growth and Happiness Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time as this ongoing debate about the relationship between average happiness and GDP growth, a striking new stylized fact has recently emerged regarding the distribution of happiness or “happiness inequality.” As documented in Clark et al . (), there is strong evidence across a wide variety of datasets that GDP growth is associated with systematically lower levels of happiness inequality (where this latter is picked up by the coefficient of variation). This paper contributes to this happiness–inequality literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are conscious that it would be desirable to understand, and be able to say more about, the distribution of well-being (though see Stevenson and Wolfers, 2008a for an innovative early approach, and Clark et al, 2012 for the recent and intriguing finding that happiness inequality is narrowing). The ideas in this paper will eventually somehow have to be fused, with those from other researchers, into a more coherent whole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hagenaars 1986;Van Praag 1993) and to calculate income-based poverty lines immediately after German reunification (Krause 1998). Over the last decade, the determinants of inequalities in happiness have also become a focus of cross-national research (Ferrer-i-Carbonell/Ramos 2010;Clark/Flèche/Senik 2012.…”
Section: Inequality Of Well-being: Considering Distributions and Socimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clark/Flèche/Senik (2012 report that the highest happiness scores can be found in rich countries with low degrees of income inequality and cite strong evidence that GDP growth is associated with lower inequalities in happiness. Schneider (2011) highlights the role of social cognitions relating to income inequality in happiness evaluations.…”
Section: Autonomy Social Cohesion and Social Emergencementioning
confidence: 99%