2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10485-016-9467-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gray Tensor Product Via Factorisation

Abstract: Abstract. We discuss the folklore construction of the Gray tensor product of 2-categories as obtained by factoring the map from the funny tensor product to the cartesian product. We show that this factorisation can be obtained without using a concrete presentation of the Gray tensor product, but merely its defining universal property, and use it to give another proof that the Gray tensor product forms part of a symmetric monoidal structure. The main technical tool is a method of producing new algebra structure… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we construct an adjunction − ⊗ D ⊣ ⟦D, −⟧ of endofunctors on the category DblCat of double categories, for any double category D. Our line of reasoning is similar to [3,Proposition 3.10]. The occurring double functor ⊗ ∶ DblCat × DblCat → DblCat is our candidate Gray monoidal product on DblCat.…”
Section: Existencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we construct an adjunction − ⊗ D ⊣ ⟦D, −⟧ of endofunctors on the category DblCat of double categories, for any double category D. Our line of reasoning is similar to [3,Proposition 3.10]. The occurring double functor ⊗ ∶ DblCat × DblCat → DblCat is our candidate Gray monoidal product on DblCat.…”
Section: Existencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows from Theorem 5.33 that, for all bicategories B and C, we can define the bicategory of functors, oplax transformations, and modifications between B and C as G[ B, C] s , and the bicategory of functors, pseudo-natural transformations, and modifications as G[ B, C] ps . The latter is part of a monoidal closed structure on BiCat with the better-known "pseudo" version of the Gray product, see for example [BG16], but we cannot see any added insight from the perspective of merge-bicategories.…”
Section: Merge-bicategories and Higher Morphismsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the sake of completeness, we provide in the Appendix (see §B) a purely algebraic description by generators and relations of the Gray tensor product A B of a pair of 2categories A and B. The definition is somewhat involved however, and we thus find more convenient to describe below a characterization of the Gray tensor product A B of two small 2-categories A , B adapted from the work by Bourke and Gurski [6]. Using this specific formulation, we establish the main result of the section, which states that the Gray tensor product of 2-categories A , B → A B preserves coreflexive equalizers componentwise.…”
Section: The Gray Tensor Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using the notations f 1 , f 2 , g 1 , g 2 given in (39). It is possible to define the Gray tensor product A B directly from there, along an idea developed by Bourke and Gurski in [6]. Every small 2-category A comes equipped with an underlying category of objects and morphisms noted |A | and with an underlying set of objects noted ||A ||.…”
Section: A a Concise Characterization Of The Gray Tensor Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation