We consider a general class of asymptotically locally AdS5 solutions of minimal gauged supergravity, which are dual to superconformal field theories on curved backgrounds S 1 × M3 preserving two supercharges. We demonstrate that standard holographic renormalization corresponds to a scheme that breaks supersymmetry. We propose new boundary terms that restore supersymmetry, and show that for smooth solutions with topology S 1 × R 4 the improved on-shell action reproduces both the supersymmetric Casimir energy and the field theory BPS relation between charges.
I. THE SUPERSYMMETRIC CASIMIR ENERGYIn [1, 2] a new observable of d = 4 superconformal field theories has been introduced: the supersymmetric Casimir energy. This is defined by putting the theory on certain curved backgrounds M 4 = S 1 β × M 3 , where S 1 β is a circle of length β and M 3 is a compact threemanifold. These are rigid supersymmetric backgrounds, and the supersymmetric Casimir energy is defined asHere the partition function Z susy is computed with periodic boundary conditions for the fermions around S 1 β . A key point is that, unlike the vacuum energy of general d = 4 conformal field theories (CFTs), E susy is schemeindependent and thus an intrinsic observable.The rigid supersymmetric backgrounds of interest comprise a metric on M 4 of the formwhere τ ∼ τ + β is a coordinate on S 1 β . The vector ∂ ψ is Killing, and generates a transversely holomorphic foliation of M 3 , with local transverse complex coordinate z. The local one-form a satisfies da = iu e w dz ∧ dz, where w = w(z,z), u = u(z,z). In addition there is a non-dynamical Abelian gauge field, which couples to the R-symmetry current and arises when the field theory is coupled to background conformal supergravity, given byNotice that the second line is locally pure gauge; however, the constant γ will play an important role. The background geometry thus depends on the choice of the two functions w(z,z), u(z,z), and via (1) the supersymmetric Casimir energy also a priori depends on this choice. These backgrounds admit two supercharges of opposite R-charge, and associated to each of these is an integrable complex structure (i.e. they are ambiHermitian). In [3] it is argued that the supersymmetric partition function depends on the background only via the choice of complex structure(s). In the present set-up, this implies that Z susy depends only on the transversely holomorphic foliation generated by ∂ ψ . In particular, deformations of w(z,z) and u(z,z) that leave this foliation fixed should not change E susy .Later in this paper we will focus on the case that topologically M 3 ∼ = S 3 . Here we may embed S 3 ⊂ R 4 = R 2 ⊕ R 2 , and write, where ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 are standard 2π periodic azimuthal angles. In this case the above statements imply that E susy should depend only on b 1 , b 2 , and the explicit calculation in [1] givesHere a and c are the usual trace anomaly coefficients for a d = 4 CFT. For field theories admitting a large N gravity dual in type IIB supergravity, to leading order in the ...