2009
DOI: 10.5194/amt-2-679-2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GRAPE aerosol retrieval algorithm

Abstract: Abstract. The aerosol component of the Oxford-Rutherford Aerosol and Cloud (ORAC) combined cloud and aerosol retrieval scheme is described and the theoretical performance of the algorithm is analysed. ORAC is an optimal estimation retrieval scheme for deriving cloud and aerosol properties from measurements made by imaging satellite radiometers and, when applied to cloud free radiances, provides estimates of aerosol optical depth at a wavelength of 550 nm, aerosol effective radius and surface reflectance at 550… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential contributions include errors in co-registration between channels, error in absolute radiometric calibration, errors in the assumed atmospheric and surface temperature profiles, errors in the planeparallel assumption (e.g., cloud vertical structure, 3-D effects), errors in the ice scattering model, impact of aerosol, error in modelling surface reflectance/emissivity, etc. The impact of these terms has been investigated in studies such as Watts et al (1998) and Siddans et al (2009). In general, the errors depend on the context of a particular retrieval (including cloud-type, clear-sky atmospheric state etc).…”
Section: Measurement Vector and Covariancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential contributions include errors in co-registration between channels, error in absolute radiometric calibration, errors in the assumed atmospheric and surface temperature profiles, errors in the planeparallel assumption (e.g., cloud vertical structure, 3-D effects), errors in the ice scattering model, impact of aerosol, error in modelling surface reflectance/emissivity, etc. The impact of these terms has been investigated in studies such as Watts et al (1998) and Siddans et al (2009). In general, the errors depend on the context of a particular retrieval (including cloud-type, clear-sky atmospheric state etc).…”
Section: Measurement Vector and Covariancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In satellite AOD retrieval algorithms these are often parametrised as a combination of aerosol components, each with specified size distribution and spectral refractive index, whose total abundance and relative weight are varied in order to best match the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiance observed by the sensor (e.g. Martonchik et al, 1998;Mishchenko et al, 1999;Remer et al, 2009;Thomas et al, 2009;Sayer et al, 2012a).…”
Section: A M Sayer Et Al: Smoke Aerosol Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result RAY meets the speed requirements for including RT computations in the AOT retrieval processing. Validation of the RAY code has demonstrated (Tynes et al, 2001) that it provides highly accurate data in a fraction of the time required by the Monte Carlo and other methods. For instance, the difference between RAY and SCIATRAN computations for aerosol atmosphere is smaller than 0.5% for all Stokes vector components (see benchmark results at http://www.iup.physik.uni-bremen.de/ ∼ alexk).…”
Section: Merismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approach can be applied operationally only if the accurate and extremely fast radiative transfer code is used. The RAY code (Tynes et al, 2001;Katsev et al, 2009) for simulation of the radiative transfer in the atmosphere-underlying surface system was used. This code is fast.…”
Section: Merismentioning
confidence: 99%