2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-017-1112-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The grain boundary character distribution of highly twinned nanocrystalline thin film aluminum compared to bulk microcrystalline aluminum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, this structure is formed by thermal annealing using a furnace or rapid thermal equipment following deposition with silver [6]. The physical properties of the Al film strongly depend on its microstructure [7,8]; therefore, by controlling the microstructure, it is possible to govern the film's properties [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, this structure is formed by thermal annealing using a furnace or rapid thermal equipment following deposition with silver [6]. The physical properties of the Al film strongly depend on its microstructure [7,8]; therefore, by controlling the microstructure, it is possible to govern the film's properties [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Σ3 boundaries constitute approximately one quarter of all the boundaries in this sample. In contrast, for a "bulk" aluminum sample, i.e., in an aluminum sample with mean grain size of 23 𝜇m, the population of Σ3 boundaries is more than ten times lower [31]. The very high population of Σ3 boundaries in the thin film sample of Figure 3 is likely a result of the structure forming processes that take place during film deposition, rather than a result of normal grain growth.…”
Section: Experimental Results: Grain Boundary Character Distributionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Figure 3 presents the GBCD for four different misorientations for an as-deposited aluminum film with near random orientation distribution. The details of film deposition, sample preparation and precession electron diffraction crystal orientation mapping in the transmission electron microscope are given in [31]. However, in contrast to [31], the orientation data were subjected to the same cleanup procedure as for the grain size distribution, namely the pseudosymmetry cleanup procedure detailed in [24] with the exception of the 60°|[111] boundaries, which are clearly abundant and should not be removed.…”
Section: Experimental Results: Grain Boundary Character Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous works have reported that the GBs show a strong preference for some special GB planes when the lattice misorientation of the two adjacent grains is specified [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 54 , 61 , 62 , 63 ]. It was speculated that these preferred GBs generally have lower GBE, and every preferred GB always has almost the lowest GBE of the GBs with the same lattice misorientation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%